ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
Rod54chair (คุย | มีส่วนร่วม) ล |
||
แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
− | + | 2015) and to not execute a total meta-analysis of all rat stroke model papers published inside the decade.Non-reportingWhile the vast majority of papers provide statements on ethical critique, the rat strain and also the model used, most fail to report subsequently on anaesthetic and monitoring strategies, such as the use of arterial or venous accesses, ventilation, oxygen supplementation, or the administration of fluids or analgesics. Although expected, this can be a important discovering. As a result, it really is attainable that changes in anaesthesia protocols and procedures have occurred, but were not picked up by our study. As an example, 85 of the stroke studies integrated in our paper didn't report around the mode of [https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/singer20europe/activity/356443/ https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/singer20europe/activity/356443/] ventilation selected for their animal (i.e., spontaneous, assisted or controlled), and up to 96 failed to report whether analgesic agents were at all utilized peri-operatively. Such levels of non-reporting are extremely similar to a recent report by Carbone and Austin [55]. We did not attempt to assess irrespective of whether the journal's impact factor or commitment to publication guidelines [13,56] have been related to different levels of report considering that final results from previous studies suggest that this is not the case [55,57,58], reinforcing the idea that guidelines might not be thePLOS One | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170243 January 25,11 /Impact of STAIR Suggestions on Rat Anesthesiagolden grail to reduction of publication bias, improved science and ultimately far more helpful translational medicine [55,52,59,60,61].Non-implementationOverall the results with the present evaluation recommend that the publication of non-binding guidelines did not significantly influence the nature and quality of the anaesthetics and peri-operative monitoring employed in studies of stroke models in rats. This disappointing outcome could be explained by quite a few components. 1st, the assistance provided by the guidelines might not be optimal. As an example, the STAIR suggestions stipulate that mechanical ventilation is "especially relevant throughout extended operations (>1 hour) and when the ischemia impacts brain stem function", that "if the experiment will not be most likely to result in respiratory failure, intubation and mechanical ventilation might not be necessary", and that "the intubation procedure itself and handle on the mechanical ventilation method are technically demanding and could result in tissue harm even in experienced hands" [13]. Additionally, the guidelines fail to quote the research linking hypercapnia and spontaneous ventilation with data variability, morbidity and mortality, despite publication lengthy prior to the STAIR recommendations [41,42,43,44,40,14,20]. Despite these limitations, one particular may well have anticipated that the STAIR recommendation to utilize mechanical ventilation would have triggered a rise within the use of mechanical ventilation and blood gas monitoring. Second, clinical suggestions will not be typically quite productive in triggering a modify in practice [62,63]. STAIR is an international working group composed of major academic researchers, American government agencies and R D representatives from market (STAIR 2001). Though STAIR is an acknowledged and respected operating group, its influence may not happen to be sufficient per se to trigger the desired adjustments; in other words, recommendations don't implement themselves [64]. Assuming that the recommendations have been communicated towards the target audience of primary investigators involved in rat modelling of stroke, numerous barriers could have prevented their helpful implementation. Four of the pre |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 23:31, 14 ธันวาคม 2564
2015) and to not execute a total meta-analysis of all rat stroke model papers published inside the decade.Non-reportingWhile the vast majority of papers provide statements on ethical critique, the rat strain and also the model used, most fail to report subsequently on anaesthetic and monitoring strategies, such as the use of arterial or venous accesses, ventilation, oxygen supplementation, or the administration of fluids or analgesics. Although expected, this can be a important discovering. As a result, it really is attainable that changes in anaesthesia protocols and procedures have occurred, but were not picked up by our study. As an example, 85 of the stroke studies integrated in our paper didn't report around the mode of https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/singer20europe/activity/356443/ ventilation selected for their animal (i.e., spontaneous, assisted or controlled), and up to 96 failed to report whether analgesic agents were at all utilized peri-operatively. Such levels of non-reporting are extremely similar to a recent report by Carbone and Austin [55]. We did not attempt to assess irrespective of whether the journal's impact factor or commitment to publication guidelines [13,56] have been related to different levels of report considering that final results from previous studies suggest that this is not the case [55,57,58], reinforcing the idea that guidelines might not be thePLOS One | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0170243 January 25,11 /Impact of STAIR Suggestions on Rat Anesthesiagolden grail to reduction of publication bias, improved science and ultimately far more helpful translational medicine [55,52,59,60,61].Non-implementationOverall the results with the present evaluation recommend that the publication of non-binding guidelines did not significantly influence the nature and quality of the anaesthetics and peri-operative monitoring employed in studies of stroke models in rats. This disappointing outcome could be explained by quite a few components. 1st, the assistance provided by the guidelines might not be optimal. As an example, the STAIR suggestions stipulate that mechanical ventilation is "especially relevant throughout extended operations (>1 hour) and when the ischemia impacts brain stem function", that "if the experiment will not be most likely to result in respiratory failure, intubation and mechanical ventilation might not be necessary", and that "the intubation procedure itself and handle on the mechanical ventilation method are technically demanding and could result in tissue harm even in experienced hands" [13]. Additionally, the guidelines fail to quote the research linking hypercapnia and spontaneous ventilation with data variability, morbidity and mortality, despite publication lengthy prior to the STAIR recommendations [41,42,43,44,40,14,20]. Despite these limitations, one particular may well have anticipated that the STAIR recommendation to utilize mechanical ventilation would have triggered a rise within the use of mechanical ventilation and blood gas monitoring. Second, clinical suggestions will not be typically quite productive in triggering a modify in practice [62,63]. STAIR is an international working group composed of major academic researchers, American government agencies and R D representatives from market (STAIR 2001). Though STAIR is an acknowledged and respected operating group, its influence may not happen to be sufficient per se to trigger the desired adjustments; in other words, recommendations don't implement themselves [64]. Assuming that the recommendations have been communicated towards the target audience of primary investigators involved in rat modelling of stroke, numerous barriers could have prevented their helpful implementation. Four of the pre