ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
แถว 1: แถว 1:
Ers, e.g. in Mar Menor, only about ,1  of each of the
+
Presumed to be the same. The known coral bacterial pathogenScientific RepoRts | 5:17425 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificreports/Vibrio coralliilyticus was used as the infectious agent to elicit a defense response in the sea anemone. It is a major coral pathogen known to cause coral bleaching27 and white syndrome in Acropora corals28. It has also been shown to cause disease and mortality in Exaiptasia pallida29. The anemone responds to V. coralliilyticus with darkening of the tissues and retraction of tentacles, followed by complete disintegration of polyp tissues29,30. The disease progression pattern is consistent with the behavior of necrotizing pathogens29. To assess the response of E. pallida anemones to repetitive encounters with the infectious agent, we first determined a sub-lethal exposure of the bacterial pathogen V. coralliilyticus that would allow priming of the host without causing mortality. It was determined that a concentration of 1 ?108 CFU ml-1 of this bacterial agent causes stress and mortality in E. pallida anemones after four days of exposure (Supplementary Fig. S1A online). Within a ten-day bacterial exposure, mortality ranged from 60 to 90  in the anemones (Supplementary Fig. S1A online). However, if anemones were removed from the bacterial challenge, washed, and placed in pathogen-free seawater after the third day of pathogen exposure, anemones would recover and show 100 survivorship comparable to unexposed (control) anemones (Supplementary Fig. S2 online). Based on these results, a sub-lethal challenge of a three-day pathogen exposure at 1 ?108 CFU ml-1 was used for the immune priming experiments. The bacterial challenges were conducted at 30  as it has been shown the virulence in this pathogen increases at temperatures above 28  27,31. We demonstrated that this experimental temperature was not a factor of mortality during the bacterial exposure trials (Supplementary Fig. S1B online). Following these trials, three experiments were performed to evaluate the existence of a priming response. Anemones were first subjected to a sub-lethal exposure of V. coralliilyticus followed by [https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/neck40layer/activity/374729/ https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/neck40layer/activity/374729/] resting periods (pathogen-free recovering time from the sub-lethal challenge) of either two, four, or six weeks before exposing the sea anemones again to a lethal exposure (ten day pathogen challenge). It is important to note that none of the anemones died during the resting period or prior to the lethal challenge. The response and survivorship of these anemones (primed group) were compared to anemones that were exposed to a lethal challenge but without prior sub-lethal exposure (non-primed group), and also to a control group in which anemones were never exposed to sub-lethal or lethal bacterial challenges. The results showed that anemones that had previously encountered the pathogen (primed) had a higher survivorship than those anemones that encountered the pathogen for the first time (Fig. 2; Kaplan Meier; Mantel ?Cox Post hoc test, p = 0.0001). The survivorship rate appeared to vary as a function of the lapsed time between the two consecutive pathogen exposures. Anemones exposed to the lethal challenge two and four weeks after the sub-lethal exposure presented seven- and five fold increases in survival, respectively, compared to the non-primed anemones (Fig. 2A-B; Kaplan-Meier; Mantel - Cox Post hoc test; Two weeks, p = 0.031; Four weeks, p = 0.039).
Ers, e.g. in Mar Menor, only about ,1  of each of the reads could possibly be assigned to betaproteobacteria (Supplementary Figure S7). They may be at similarly low levels inside the Deep Chlorophyll Maximum, Punta Cormoran and SS19 datasets as well. This is in concordance with similar benefits concerning the low abundance of betaproteobacteria in marine metagenomic datasets which have been obtained before8. Eukaryotes. In the collected metagenomic data it is actually possible to determine eukaryotic sequences ,12  Mar Menor, ,two  Albufera from comparison to the total NR database. Certainly, the amount of eukaryotic reads increased progressively with rising filter size (Supplementary Figure S5). The total quantity of 18S sequences identified in Mar Menor and Albufera were 28 (,five of total SSUs) and 22 (,five  of total SSUs) respectively. The main eukaryote identified in Mar Menor was Alexandrium (,18 , n55) a marine armored dinoflagellate that produces neurotoxins that lead to paralytic shellfish poisoning. Alexandrium is well known in coastal lagoons inside the Mediterranean69 and has each autotrophic and heterotrophic species. Alexandrium blooms are dangerous and are famously known as red tides. The toxins it produces can have adverse effects when consumed by humans, usually in the type of contaminated seafood (shellfish, fish etc)70. Additionally, these blooms are typical in coastal habitats, and have an effect on marine trophic structure, boost mortality of marine fish, birds and mammals and disrupt recreational activities70. Dinoflagellate blooms are usually [https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/singer20europe/activity/363629/ https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/singer20europe/activity/363629/] correlated with improved levels of lowered nitrogen sources, particularly ammonia and urea (at the least for Alexandrium)71. Photosynthetic dinoflagellates can supplement photosynthetic growth by organic sources along with the increase inside the levels of inorganic nutrients (especially nitrogen and phosphorus)72, coupled by their capacity to produced paralyzing toxins make them robust competitors in eutrophic systems, affecting multicellular and unicellular life alike73. On the other hand, toxin production by Alexandrium is inconsistent, and not all species are toxic. On top of that to Alexandrium, other dinoflagellates had been also detected (e.g. Gymnodinium, Protoceratium). An additional abundant organism present by 18S rRNA in Mar Menor was Chrysochromulina (n54), that is a haptophyte from the class Prymnesiophyceae. Haptophytes (e.g Chrysochromulina, Phaeocystis, Prymnesium), are all bloom forming organisms. The certain feature of haptophytes is definitely the presence of a haptonema, a flagella-like (though only superficially), retractile, coiled protuberance, performing a number of functions (e.g. sensory responses, prey capture)74. Chrysochromulina can also be photosynthetic, and (like some Alexandrium species), can supplement photosynthetic growth by mixotrophic feeding. Indeed, some Chrysochromulina species are truly euryhaline also, having a a lot larger level of optimum salinity for growth75 than marine levels. Within a microscopic examination and enumeration on the planktonic species, we were able to recognize numerous abundant diatoms (e.g.SCIENTIFIC REPORTS | 2 : 490 | DOI: ten.1038/srepCyclotella, Entomoneis, Nitszchia). Cyclotella was identified by its 18S rRNA sequence within the metagenomic data also. It is actually a well-known abundant centric diatom. Some Cyclotella species are recognized to become linked with high nutrient concentrations, specifically phosphorus, and therefore are basically associated with polluted, eutrophic waters76,77. On the other hand, probably the most abundant orga.
 

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 17:29, 22 ธันวาคม 2564

Presumed to be the same. The known coral bacterial pathogenScientific RepoRts | 5:17425 | DOI: 10.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificreports/Vibrio coralliilyticus was used as the infectious agent to elicit a defense response in the sea anemone. It is a major coral pathogen known to cause coral bleaching27 and white syndrome in Acropora corals28. It has also been shown to cause disease and mortality in Exaiptasia pallida29. The anemone responds to V. coralliilyticus with darkening of the tissues and retraction of tentacles, followed by complete disintegration of polyp tissues29,30. The disease progression pattern is consistent with the behavior of necrotizing pathogens29. To assess the response of E. pallida anemones to repetitive encounters with the infectious agent, we first determined a sub-lethal exposure of the bacterial pathogen V. coralliilyticus that would allow priming of the host without causing mortality. It was determined that a concentration of 1 ?108 CFU ml-1 of this bacterial agent causes stress and mortality in E. pallida anemones after four days of exposure (Supplementary Fig. S1A online). Within a ten-day bacterial exposure, mortality ranged from 60 to 90 in the anemones (Supplementary Fig. S1A online). However, if anemones were removed from the bacterial challenge, washed, and placed in pathogen-free seawater after the third day of pathogen exposure, anemones would recover and show 100 survivorship comparable to unexposed (control) anemones (Supplementary Fig. S2 online). Based on these results, a sub-lethal challenge of a three-day pathogen exposure at 1 ?108 CFU ml-1 was used for the immune priming experiments. The bacterial challenges were conducted at 30 as it has been shown the virulence in this pathogen increases at temperatures above 28 27,31. We demonstrated that this experimental temperature was not a factor of mortality during the bacterial exposure trials (Supplementary Fig. S1B online). Following these trials, three experiments were performed to evaluate the existence of a priming response. Anemones were first subjected to a sub-lethal exposure of V. coralliilyticus followed by https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/neck40layer/activity/374729/ resting periods (pathogen-free recovering time from the sub-lethal challenge) of either two, four, or six weeks before exposing the sea anemones again to a lethal exposure (ten day pathogen challenge). It is important to note that none of the anemones died during the resting period or prior to the lethal challenge. The response and survivorship of these anemones (primed group) were compared to anemones that were exposed to a lethal challenge but without prior sub-lethal exposure (non-primed group), and also to a control group in which anemones were never exposed to sub-lethal or lethal bacterial challenges. The results showed that anemones that had previously encountered the pathogen (primed) had a higher survivorship than those anemones that encountered the pathogen for the first time (Fig. 2; Kaplan Meier; Mantel ?Cox Post hoc test, p = 0.0001). The survivorship rate appeared to vary as a function of the lapsed time between the two consecutive pathogen exposures. Anemones exposed to the lethal challenge two and four weeks after the sub-lethal exposure presented seven- and five fold increases in survival, respectively, compared to the non-primed anemones (Fig. 2A-B; Kaplan-Meier; Mantel - Cox Post hoc test; Two weeks, p = 0.031; Four weeks, p = 0.039).