ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
Rod54chair (คุย | มีส่วนร่วม) ล |
||
แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
− | + | and there was even a trend acquiring that this "pure" psychiatric labeling situation resulted in significantly less social distance than the "mixed" labeling situation ("schizophrenia" + "uncle"). This discovering may be a minimum of partially accounted for by the tendency for Chinese respondents to more probably recognize [https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/redcandle3/activity/377197/ https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/redcandle3/activity/377197/] themselves and others with regards to social roles than do American respondents [69]. Provided the emphasis on collective duty and the Confucian desire to preserve social order in China [8], it can be plausible that individuals with schizophrenia who prescribe to their "patient role" and adhere to therapy may be observed as more favorable than those that usually do not. This, additionally to stigma of untreated psychosis getting noticed as specifically negative [70], could have contributed to mitigating social distance towards people today with schizophrenia who enter psychiatric remedy. More detailed differentiation with the mechanisms by which these labeling mechanisms function might be the concentrate of further empirical function. Personal get in touch with and labeling in lowering stigma Personal contact where people possess the chance to interact with individuals with mental illness, in contrast to "impersonal" get in touch with, has been shown to become the most trustworthy signifies of decreasing community stigma towards mental illness amongst Western groups. Retrospective "personal" speak to alone was located to predict lowered stigma within a critique of nine empiricalNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSoc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. Author manuscript; out there in PMC 2013 September 01.Yang et al.Pagestudies conducted in Western settings [64]. But its efficacy amongst Chinese groups has yet to become conclusively determined. Enhanced prior private get in touch with with people today with mental illness in our urban, northern Chinese sample did not independently minimize community attitudes of social distance. Our benefits are similar to a study of Chinese nurses' attitudes, which were measured just after assessing for retrospective personal get in touch with (i.e., by reported household history of psychiatric illness) and potential private make contact with (i.e., following participating in psychiatric coaching [62]). Neither kind of personal make contact with was found to lead to extra positive mental illness attitudes. A possible explanation for our non-significant findings may very well be that we didn't explicitly account for the nature of personal contact that respondents knowledgeable, as elements including form of status (equal or not), degree of intimacy, regardless of whether make contact with was voluntary, perceived as pleasant, and viewed as cooperative or competitive are critical to determining its effect on stigmatizing attitudes [64]. Experiencing optimistic excellent of contact (i.e., obtaining equal status, one-on-one get in touch with, and becoming placed in a cooperative scenario) is optimal to altering stereotypes about a stigmatized group [71]. If private make contact with took place in situations where individuals with mental illness were not afforded equal status (a common circumstance in China [63]), then stigma reduction is significantly less likely to possess occurred in these situations. We additional took advantage of a distinctive opportunity in China to examine whether individual contact lowered stigma towards symptomatic behavior, the psychiatric label itself, or when labels of symptomatology encompassed alternative labels (i.e. cultural idioms). Within the "schizophrenia" labeling conditions, make contact with did not act to decrease social distance, therefore implying that make contact with did not decrease stigma towards symp |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 22:42, 30 ธันวาคม 2564
and there was even a trend acquiring that this "pure" psychiatric labeling situation resulted in significantly less social distance than the "mixed" labeling situation ("schizophrenia" + "uncle"). This discovering may be a minimum of partially accounted for by the tendency for Chinese respondents to more probably recognize https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/redcandle3/activity/377197/ themselves and others with regards to social roles than do American respondents [69]. Provided the emphasis on collective duty and the Confucian desire to preserve social order in China [8], it can be plausible that individuals with schizophrenia who prescribe to their "patient role" and adhere to therapy may be observed as more favorable than those that usually do not. This, additionally to stigma of untreated psychosis getting noticed as specifically negative [70], could have contributed to mitigating social distance towards people today with schizophrenia who enter psychiatric remedy. More detailed differentiation with the mechanisms by which these labeling mechanisms function might be the concentrate of further empirical function. Personal get in touch with and labeling in lowering stigma Personal contact where people possess the chance to interact with individuals with mental illness, in contrast to "impersonal" get in touch with, has been shown to become the most trustworthy signifies of decreasing community stigma towards mental illness amongst Western groups. Retrospective "personal" speak to alone was located to predict lowered stigma within a critique of nine empiricalNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptSoc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. Author manuscript; out there in PMC 2013 September 01.Yang et al.Pagestudies conducted in Western settings [64]. But its efficacy amongst Chinese groups has yet to become conclusively determined. Enhanced prior private get in touch with with people today with mental illness in our urban, northern Chinese sample did not independently minimize community attitudes of social distance. Our benefits are similar to a study of Chinese nurses' attitudes, which were measured just after assessing for retrospective personal get in touch with (i.e., by reported household history of psychiatric illness) and potential private make contact with (i.e., following participating in psychiatric coaching [62]). Neither kind of personal make contact with was found to lead to extra positive mental illness attitudes. A possible explanation for our non-significant findings may very well be that we didn't explicitly account for the nature of personal contact that respondents knowledgeable, as elements including form of status (equal or not), degree of intimacy, regardless of whether make contact with was voluntary, perceived as pleasant, and viewed as cooperative or competitive are critical to determining its effect on stigmatizing attitudes [64]. Experiencing optimistic excellent of contact (i.e., obtaining equal status, one-on-one get in touch with, and becoming placed in a cooperative scenario) is optimal to altering stereotypes about a stigmatized group [71]. If private make contact with took place in situations where individuals with mental illness were not afforded equal status (a common circumstance in China [63]), then stigma reduction is significantly less likely to possess occurred in these situations. We additional took advantage of a distinctive opportunity in China to examine whether individual contact lowered stigma towards symptomatic behavior, the psychiatric label itself, or when labels of symptomatology encompassed alternative labels (i.e. cultural idioms). Within the "schizophrenia" labeling conditions, make contact with did not act to decrease social distance, therefore implying that make contact with did not decrease stigma towards symp