ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
Herondrill2 (คุย | มีส่วนร่วม) ล |
||
แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
− | + | Tions, gaze directions had been chosen in the set of directions observed | |
+ | Tions, gaze directions had been chosen in the set of directions [https://www.medchemexpress.com/L-Kynurenine.html L-Kynurenine manufacturer] observed with actual fixations, but the correspondence among gaze directions and video frames was randomly shuffled. For each selected gaze path, we assigned the fixation distance that corresponded for the scene distance in that direction. (In other words, we didn't build fixations in which the viewer could be converged and accommodated in front of or behind surfaces inside the scene.) With this procedure, the distributions of gaze directions will be the exact same for actual and random fixations. The sets of 3D scenes are also needless to say precisely the same. The percentages of detectable blurs for random fixations are shown in Figure 15. Detectable blur is far more popular than with actual fixations, specifically inside the decrease visual field. This result shows that fixation methods are inclined to lessen blur, in particular in the reduce field. To further examine this observation, we computed the medians and typical deviations of relative distances just above and under the fovea. They're plotted as a function of semicircle radius in Figure 16A and B. The medians inside the upper and lower fields are much more negative with random fixations along with the normal deviations are normally bigger. Due to the fact genuine fixations had been normally constructive within the upper field and unfavorable inside the reduced, random fixations bring about fewer observations that areFigure 16. Medians and normal deviations of relative distance with true and random fixations. (A) Median relative distances within the upper and lower fields plotted as a function of radial distance from the fovea. The medians have been computed from all relative distances within the semicircular sampling window. The red and blue curves represent the information in the upper and reduced fields, respectively. Strong and dashed curves represent the information from actual and random fixations, respectively. (B) Common deviations of relative distances within the upper and reduce fields as a function of distance from fovea. The red and blue curves represent information from the upper and reduce fields, respectively. Strong and dashed curves represent data from true and random fixations, respectively.Journal of Vision (2016) 16(10):23, 1?Sprague et al.Figure 17. Refocusings essential for distinctive thresholds. The estimated quantity of refocusings per second is plotted as a function on the modify in diopters that call for a refocus response. The thin colored curves represent these values for each of your individual tasks averaged across subjects. The thick black curve represents those values for the weighted combination of data across the tasks, once again averaged across subjects. The dashed lines indicate the amount of refocusings needed if the refocus threshold is 0.4 diopters.substantially unique from zero within the upper field and much more which are substantially distinctive from zero in the reduce field. Hence, the manner in which folks pick points to fixate inside the observed 3D scene causes a reduction of adverse relative distance in addition to a reduction inside the variation of relative distance. We speculate that individuals are inclined to prevent fixation points that would position a depth discontinuity (e.g., an occlusion) in the decrease 108 in the visual field. |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 20:08, 11 มกราคม 2565
Tions, gaze directions had been chosen in the set of directions observed Tions, gaze directions had been chosen in the set of directions L-Kynurenine manufacturer observed with actual fixations, but the correspondence among gaze directions and video frames was randomly shuffled. For each selected gaze path, we assigned the fixation distance that corresponded for the scene distance in that direction. (In other words, we didn't build fixations in which the viewer could be converged and accommodated in front of or behind surfaces inside the scene.) With this procedure, the distributions of gaze directions will be the exact same for actual and random fixations. The sets of 3D scenes are also needless to say precisely the same. The percentages of detectable blurs for random fixations are shown in Figure 15. Detectable blur is far more popular than with actual fixations, specifically inside the decrease visual field. This result shows that fixation methods are inclined to lessen blur, in particular in the reduce field. To further examine this observation, we computed the medians and typical deviations of relative distances just above and under the fovea. They're plotted as a function of semicircle radius in Figure 16A and B. The medians inside the upper and lower fields are much more negative with random fixations along with the normal deviations are normally bigger. Due to the fact genuine fixations had been normally constructive within the upper field and unfavorable inside the reduced, random fixations bring about fewer observations that areFigure 16. Medians and normal deviations of relative distance with true and random fixations. (A) Median relative distances within the upper and lower fields plotted as a function of radial distance from the fovea. The medians have been computed from all relative distances within the semicircular sampling window. The red and blue curves represent the information in the upper and reduced fields, respectively. Strong and dashed curves represent the information from actual and random fixations, respectively. (B) Common deviations of relative distances within the upper and reduce fields as a function of distance from fovea. The red and blue curves represent information from the upper and reduce fields, respectively. Strong and dashed curves represent data from true and random fixations, respectively.Journal of Vision (2016) 16(10):23, 1?Sprague et al.Figure 17. Refocusings essential for distinctive thresholds. The estimated quantity of refocusings per second is plotted as a function on the modify in diopters that call for a refocus response. The thin colored curves represent these values for each of your individual tasks averaged across subjects. The thick black curve represents those values for the weighted combination of data across the tasks, once again averaged across subjects. The dashed lines indicate the amount of refocusings needed if the refocus threshold is 0.4 diopters.substantially unique from zero within the upper field and much more which are substantially distinctive from zero in the reduce field. Hence, the manner in which folks pick points to fixate inside the observed 3D scene causes a reduction of adverse relative distance in addition to a reduction inside the variation of relative distance. We speculate that individuals are inclined to prevent fixation points that would position a depth discontinuity (e.g., an occlusion) in the decrease 108 in the visual field.