ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
ล
ล
แถว 1: แถว 1:
−
Versal classification system that captures all variant presentations of CL/P. Given the existence of so many approaches, every of which has merit in its personal appropriate, our goal is not to invent yet a different classification scheme but rather to create a unifying framework that should accommodate and reconcile existing classification schemes. To make such a framework calls for that we explicitly represent the assumptions underlying every classification scheme when it comes to the basic anatomy, pathology and developmental processes. To make this framework we initially consulted quite a few current ontologies or controlled vocabularies relating to malformations, namely: SNOMED-CT [Spackman and Campbell, 1998] Human Illness Ontology (HDO) [Du et al., 2009], Human Phenotype Ontology (HPO) [Robinson and Mundlos, 2010], ICD-10CM [NCHS, 2013], and Components of Morphology [Allanson et al., 2009]. Generally, most sources don't consist of representation with the underlying fundamental science inside the phenotypic descriptions. One example is, HPO classifies "cleft upper lip" as an abnormality of your upper lip but will not clearly specify whether or not the term pertains for the pathological structure itself or its phenotypic abnormality. It really is important to distinguish involving the two mainly because the kinds of standard facts that are associated with every single are drastically diverse from 1 a further. That's, pathological structures could possibly be described by morphometric [https://www.medchemexpress.com/X-396_hydrochloride.html X-396 hydrochloride Data Sheet] measurements (e.g. upper lip height, philtrum width) whereas phenotypic abnormalities may very well be described by processual properties (e.g. transforms, derives, fusion, or partial fusion). The framework we've made for that reason consists of creating separate sub-ontologies for pathological structures and phenotypic abnormalities, using canonical anatomy because the basisNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptAm J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. Author manuscript; out there in PMC 2014 June 02.Brinkley et al.Pagefor classifying each types of entities, and ontology best practices to ensure consistency with higher level classification systems [Rosse et al., 2005; Grenon et al., 2004].NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptFigure 6 illustrates this dual representation for cleft upper lip. Since we regard cleft upper lip as a pathological structure (as opposed to a phenotypic abnormality) we say that Cleft upper lip is actually a Pathological structure. We say that Cleft upper lip has_condition Clefting of upper lip, that is a Phenotypic abnormality. We then associate these entities with their corresponding canonical structures inside the CHO. As a result, Cleft upper lip is actually a variation_of Upper lip, and Clefting of upper lip is located_in the Upper lip, wherein a gap exists among particular regions with the upper lip. We also associate morphometric measurements and descriptors with canonical structures. These measurements, which come in the AEO, consist of such properties as "cleft" and length ("philtrum length"), which can be the basis for classifying an Upper lip as a Pathological structure. Similarly, we program to associate phenotypic abnormalities like Clefting of upper lip, with pathological processes for instance Partial-fusion or Non-fusion of precursor developmental structures. By associating these kinds of entities with each other and with canonical developmental structures by means of specific relations whose basic biological meaning is well-defined, we can represent qualitative know-how of developmental biol.
+
Possess, with the evolutionary approach just about unaffected by the behavior
 +
Possess, with the evolutionary approach just about unaffected by the behavior of organisms themselves (or so the equations at the heart of evolutionary theory, population genetics, imply). A radically various viewpoint views living beings as non-linearly coupled organism-environment systems, whose actions substantially influence the evolutionary course of action through two distinct pathways: the developmental creation of potentially directed or adaptive variations, plus the active construction from the population's niche and therefore the selection pressures acting on it. Beneath the latter viewpoint it should not matter if you start off withThese niches afford the pups a array of other experiences. Inside the previous section we encountered Michael Meaney and collaborators' discovery that natural variation in maternal care, elicited by experiences in the mother, influence strain responses, exploratory and maternal care behavior within the offspring. The high quality of the mother's licking and grooming behavior outcomes within a cascadewww.frontiersin.orgAugust 2014 | Volume five | Post 908 |StotzExtended evolutionary psychologya revised vision of the nature of life and cognition or perhaps a revised vision with the nature on the mechanisms that underlie the procedure of evolution. 1 should really prescribe the other.DISEMBODIED MINDS And also the Contemporary SYNTHESISThe contemporary synthesis asserts that mutation in genes supply the only (and, at that, blind and non-directed) variations plus the slow process of natural selection acting on these variations is its direction-giving, order-producing or creative force. Genetic variations establish the organism's qualities, which in turn influence its fitness, i.e., its potential to survive and reproduce. Genetic inheritance renders these fitness differences hereditary. Due to the fact evolution is defined as adjustments in gene frequencies, it is implied that development, including potential developmental modifications via phenotypic plasticity or the behavior of organisms, plays no part within this procedure. The causes of phenotypic variation, evolution's most important currency, are solely genetic: blind mutation, sexual recombination, genetic drift and gene flow. Additionally, all-natural choice is the result of hostile external forces on populations, a "struggle for existence" which outcomes inside the "survival from the fittest." Each take spot with out any acknowledged influence in the organism--with the notable exception of sexual choice, already envisioned by Darwin as a secondary mechanism of choice, which is tremendously influenced by the decision of an organism's option of sexual partners. Inside the seventies, ideas of evolutionary game theory, the competition in between different genetically inherited techniques of survival and reproduction, were added. Right now we also have theories of coevolution, for example geneculture coevolution, and niche construction. These theories all perform by recognizing that populations influence, to some extent, their very own selection pressures. The primary purpose for this relative neglect on the organism in the modern day synthesis was that any influence by the building organism that is certainly not originally caused by its genetic make-up was assumed to not leave any trace effects on its descendants. And so it comes as no surprise that the key equations in population genetics, the formal backbone of your contemporary synthesis, calculate frequency and interaction of alleles and genes in populations, with out any mention from the organism.THE Role OF EMBODIED, EMBEDDED AND EXTENDED.

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 01:58, 22 มิถุนายน 2564

Possess, with the evolutionary approach just about unaffected by the behavior Possess, with the evolutionary approach just about unaffected by the behavior of organisms themselves (or so the equations at the heart of evolutionary theory, population genetics, imply). A radically various viewpoint views living beings as non-linearly coupled organism-environment systems, whose actions substantially influence the evolutionary course of action through two distinct pathways: the developmental creation of potentially directed or adaptive variations, plus the active construction from the population's niche and therefore the selection pressures acting on it. Beneath the latter viewpoint it should not matter if you start off withThese niches afford the pups a array of other experiences. Inside the previous section we encountered Michael Meaney and collaborators' discovery that natural variation in maternal care, elicited by experiences in the mother, influence strain responses, exploratory and maternal care behavior within the offspring. The high quality of the mother's licking and grooming behavior outcomes within a cascadewww.frontiersin.orgAugust 2014 | Volume five | Post 908 |StotzExtended evolutionary psychologya revised vision of the nature of life and cognition or perhaps a revised vision with the nature on the mechanisms that underlie the procedure of evolution. 1 should really prescribe the other.DISEMBODIED MINDS And also the Contemporary SYNTHESISThe contemporary synthesis asserts that mutation in genes supply the only (and, at that, blind and non-directed) variations plus the slow process of natural selection acting on these variations is its direction-giving, order-producing or creative force. Genetic variations establish the organism's qualities, which in turn influence its fitness, i.e., its potential to survive and reproduce. Genetic inheritance renders these fitness differences hereditary. Due to the fact evolution is defined as adjustments in gene frequencies, it is implied that development, including potential developmental modifications via phenotypic plasticity or the behavior of organisms, plays no part within this procedure. The causes of phenotypic variation, evolution's most important currency, are solely genetic: blind mutation, sexual recombination, genetic drift and gene flow. Additionally, all-natural choice is the result of hostile external forces on populations, a "struggle for existence" which outcomes inside the "survival from the fittest." Each take spot with out any acknowledged influence in the organism--with the notable exception of sexual choice, already envisioned by Darwin as a secondary mechanism of choice, which is tremendously influenced by the decision of an organism's option of sexual partners. Inside the seventies, ideas of evolutionary game theory, the competition in between different genetically inherited techniques of survival and reproduction, were added. Right now we also have theories of coevolution, for example geneculture coevolution, and niche construction. These theories all perform by recognizing that populations influence, to some extent, their very own selection pressures. The primary purpose for this relative neglect on the organism in the modern day synthesis was that any influence by the building organism that is certainly not originally caused by its genetic make-up was assumed to not leave any trace effects on its descendants. And so it comes as no surprise that the key equations in population genetics, the formal backbone of your contemporary synthesis, calculate frequency and interaction of alleles and genes in populations, with out any mention from the organism.THE Role OF EMBODIED, EMBEDDED AND EXTENDED.

ดึงข้อมูลจาก "https://wiki.surinsanghasociety.com/index.php?title=หน้าหลัก&oldid=112004"