ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
ล |
||
| แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
| − | + | In Psychology | Perception ScienceDecember 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 1453 |Ungan and YagciogluWeber fraction for | |
| − | + | In Psychology | Perception ScienceDecember 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 1453 |Ungan and YagciogluWeber fraction for modifications in click ratethose measured by us for comparable rates. A dramatic alteration in WF for example the one particular observed in the 20?0 clicks/s variety in both of those earlier studies at the same time as within the present a single, is fairly uncommon within a single perception mechanism and clearly speaks for the presence of separate mechanisms for processing the click price at lengthy and short ICIs. This viewpoint is in line using the psychophysical observation produced by our subjects that the perceived qualities are distinct within the two ranges; i.e, speedy tapping rhythm versus pitch of a steady smooth sound, respectively.Distinct mechanisms for temporal and spectral discriminationThere are neural imaging studies indicating separate cortical mechanisms for temporal and spectral processing auditory stimuli. For instance the outcomes of the positron emission tomography study of Zatorre and Belin (2001), who examined the response of human auditory cortex to spectral and temporal variation, indicated specialization of the left-hemisphere auditory cortex for rapid temporal processing, as well as a complementary hemispheric specialization in right-hemisphere belt cortical locations for spectral processing. It's illustrated in Figure three that the above-explained behavior of the WF versus click price function might be modeled as a combination of two curves, 1 for low along with the other for highclick rates. We hypothesize that these two curves belong to two separate perception mechanisms for time intervals and pitch, respectively. There seems to become a area around 20 Hz in which the rate discrimination threshold is elevated to a maximum. Such a maximum has also been reported inside the current function of Phillips et al. (2012) who studied human sensitivity to price alteration in 25-click trains with ICIs involving 20 and 100 ms working with wideband clicks. They describe maximal WFs for ICIs around 40?0 ms, which specifically coincides with the ICI for which the WF displays a maximum inside the present study (i.e., 50 ms). It's to be noted that this region, in which each in the presumed time and pitch mechanisms are reasonably insensitive to rate alterations, coincides with all the array of repetition prices in which an initially high-frequency click train perceived as a continuous steady sound begins to be described by the subjects as a fluttered sound because the click price is decreased. Depending on these psychophysical observations, we speculate that, inside the low repetition rate region a temporal perception mechanism, which analyses time intervals involving peaks inside the neural activity pattern, is active; whereas within the greater repetition price region a pitch perception mechanism, which analyses the spectral options on the sound coded tonotopically within the peripheral and central mechanisms in the auditory method, requires over. Nonetheless, as schematized in Figure three,FIGURE three | An illustration showing that the variation of WF as a function of click rate might be modeled as a combination of two curves, 1 for low and also the other for higher click rates. We hypothesize that these two curves, that are drawn by blue and red lines, belong to two separate perception mechanisms for time intervals and pitch, functioning at lengthy andshort inter-onset intervals, respectively. | |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 08:22, 24 มิถุนายน 2564
In Psychology | Perception ScienceDecember 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 1453 |Ungan and YagciogluWeber fraction for In Psychology | Perception ScienceDecember 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 1453 |Ungan and YagciogluWeber fraction for modifications in click ratethose measured by us for comparable rates. A dramatic alteration in WF for example the one particular observed in the 20?0 clicks/s variety in both of those earlier studies at the same time as within the present a single, is fairly uncommon within a single perception mechanism and clearly speaks for the presence of separate mechanisms for processing the click price at lengthy and short ICIs. This viewpoint is in line using the psychophysical observation produced by our subjects that the perceived qualities are distinct within the two ranges; i.e, speedy tapping rhythm versus pitch of a steady smooth sound, respectively.Distinct mechanisms for temporal and spectral discriminationThere are neural imaging studies indicating separate cortical mechanisms for temporal and spectral processing auditory stimuli. For instance the outcomes of the positron emission tomography study of Zatorre and Belin (2001), who examined the response of human auditory cortex to spectral and temporal variation, indicated specialization of the left-hemisphere auditory cortex for rapid temporal processing, as well as a complementary hemispheric specialization in right-hemisphere belt cortical locations for spectral processing. It's illustrated in Figure three that the above-explained behavior of the WF versus click price function might be modeled as a combination of two curves, 1 for low along with the other for highclick rates. We hypothesize that these two curves belong to two separate perception mechanisms for time intervals and pitch, respectively. There seems to become a area around 20 Hz in which the rate discrimination threshold is elevated to a maximum. Such a maximum has also been reported inside the current function of Phillips et al. (2012) who studied human sensitivity to price alteration in 25-click trains with ICIs involving 20 and 100 ms working with wideband clicks. They describe maximal WFs for ICIs around 40?0 ms, which specifically coincides with the ICI for which the WF displays a maximum inside the present study (i.e., 50 ms). It's to be noted that this region, in which each in the presumed time and pitch mechanisms are reasonably insensitive to rate alterations, coincides with all the array of repetition prices in which an initially high-frequency click train perceived as a continuous steady sound begins to be described by the subjects as a fluttered sound because the click price is decreased. Depending on these psychophysical observations, we speculate that, inside the low repetition rate region a temporal perception mechanism, which analyses time intervals involving peaks inside the neural activity pattern, is active; whereas within the greater repetition price region a pitch perception mechanism, which analyses the spectral options on the sound coded tonotopically within the peripheral and central mechanisms in the auditory method, requires over. Nonetheless, as schematized in Figure three,FIGURE three | An illustration showing that the variation of WF as a function of click rate might be modeled as a combination of two curves, 1 for low and also the other for higher click rates. We hypothesize that these two curves, that are drawn by blue and red lines, belong to two separate perception mechanisms for time intervals and pitch, functioning at lengthy andshort inter-onset intervals, respectively.
