ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
ล |
||
แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
− | + | Of many transportable distributed sub-apertures or sub-radars. It is shown that | |
+ | Of many transportable distributed sub-apertures or sub-radars. It is shown that NGR has improved mobility, stronger survival potential and comparable processing achieve compared with all the regular massive aperture phased array radar. Additionally, an experimental NGR program with two radars has been constructed by the Lincoln Laboratory, which can be reported in [3] to possess obtained inspiring coherent processing get in field tests, showing its excellent application prospects. Within this paper, we take into consideration NGR using a master-slave architecture, where all of the radars transmit signals and only the master radar receives the echoes. It really is known that the maximum echo power is often accomplished only when we make all the transmitted signals arrive at the target at the very same time and in-phase, namely, the coherence achieve is obtained through coherent processing. Even so, the distributed architecture of NGR tends to make it hard to coherently combine signals for two causes. 1st, the range from a target to diverse radars could possibly be distinctive, top to echoes with unique propagation time delays and phases; second, each and every radar has an independent local oscillator with diverse transmit and receive (T/R) phases, which also adds phase shifts to echoes. Since each the T/R phases as well as the phase triggered by propagation delay can influence the coherence achieve, we add the two phases with each other and name the sum as total phase. In NGR, each the mismatches of time and phase can cause efficiency degradation. To overcome this shortage, an operation process of two actions has been proposed [2]. Within the initially step which is also known as the MIMO mode, every single radar transmits a probing signal (generally orthogonal waveforms) to estimate the time delay variations and total phase differences amongst sub-radars plus the master radar, and they may be known as coherence parameters (CPs) [2?]. Within the second step which can be also named the coherent mode, all radars transmit coherent waveforms adjusted by the estimated CPs from MIMO mode. Clearly, the estimation accuracy of CPs significantly impacts the coherence get that may be obtained by NGR, which raises two essential questions: What is the finest estimation accuracy for the CPs? Just how much coherence acquire can we get assuming that estimation accuracy is achievable? An additional difficulty in NGR lies inside the constraint of program size, i.e., the number of radars cannot be arbitrarily large in practice. Thus, the maximum SNR obtain that could be obtained merely via the spatially coherent processing of distributed radars is limited, which can be unfavorable in detecting and tracking long-range weak targets. To settle this trouble, it is actually natural and necessary to emit pulse trains in NGR, which signifies we are going to accumulate the energy of echoes not simply from diverse radars but in addition from various pulses. In NGR transmitting pulse trains, new questions straight away emerge: How will the introduction of pulse trains impact the estimation accuracy of aforementioned CPs? Are there any new parameters that have to have to be estimated? If any, what is the best estimation accuracy for all those parameters? What is the optimal coherence performance for NGR with pulse trains?Sensors 2013,A thorough critique from the existing literature on NGR reveals that the present signal models in NGR are all based on single pulse schemes [2?], whereas the transmission of pulse trains has not been considered but. |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 03:41, 13 กรกฎาคม 2564
Of many transportable distributed sub-apertures or sub-radars. It is shown that Of many transportable distributed sub-apertures or sub-radars. It is shown that NGR has improved mobility, stronger survival potential and comparable processing achieve compared with all the regular massive aperture phased array radar. Additionally, an experimental NGR program with two radars has been constructed by the Lincoln Laboratory, which can be reported in [3] to possess obtained inspiring coherent processing get in field tests, showing its excellent application prospects. Within this paper, we take into consideration NGR using a master-slave architecture, where all of the radars transmit signals and only the master radar receives the echoes. It really is known that the maximum echo power is often accomplished only when we make all the transmitted signals arrive at the target at the very same time and in-phase, namely, the coherence achieve is obtained through coherent processing. Even so, the distributed architecture of NGR tends to make it hard to coherently combine signals for two causes. 1st, the range from a target to diverse radars could possibly be distinctive, top to echoes with unique propagation time delays and phases; second, each and every radar has an independent local oscillator with diverse transmit and receive (T/R) phases, which also adds phase shifts to echoes. Since each the T/R phases as well as the phase triggered by propagation delay can influence the coherence achieve, we add the two phases with each other and name the sum as total phase. In NGR, each the mismatches of time and phase can cause efficiency degradation. To overcome this shortage, an operation process of two actions has been proposed [2]. Within the initially step which is also known as the MIMO mode, every single radar transmits a probing signal (generally orthogonal waveforms) to estimate the time delay variations and total phase differences amongst sub-radars plus the master radar, and they may be known as coherence parameters (CPs) [2?]. Within the second step which can be also named the coherent mode, all radars transmit coherent waveforms adjusted by the estimated CPs from MIMO mode. Clearly, the estimation accuracy of CPs significantly impacts the coherence get that may be obtained by NGR, which raises two essential questions: What is the finest estimation accuracy for the CPs? Just how much coherence acquire can we get assuming that estimation accuracy is achievable? An additional difficulty in NGR lies inside the constraint of program size, i.e., the number of radars cannot be arbitrarily large in practice. Thus, the maximum SNR obtain that could be obtained merely via the spatially coherent processing of distributed radars is limited, which can be unfavorable in detecting and tracking long-range weak targets. To settle this trouble, it is actually natural and necessary to emit pulse trains in NGR, which signifies we are going to accumulate the energy of echoes not simply from diverse radars but in addition from various pulses. In NGR transmitting pulse trains, new questions straight away emerge: How will the introduction of pulse trains impact the estimation accuracy of aforementioned CPs? Are there any new parameters that have to have to be estimated? If any, what is the best estimation accuracy for all those parameters? What is the optimal coherence performance for NGR with pulse trains?Sensors 2013,A thorough critique from the existing literature on NGR reveals that the present signal models in NGR are all based on single pulse schemes [2?], whereas the transmission of pulse trains has not been considered but.