ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
ล |
||
แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
− | - | + | The third essential point is that it really is constantly within the context of organism-environment transactions that values arise and influence behavior. Our encounter is value-laden all of the way down towards the primitive emergence with the values essential for life upkeep. Damasio concludes, "I see value as indelibly tied to want, and require as tied to life. The valuations we establish in every day social and cultural activities possess a direct and indirect connection with homeostasis.... Worth relates directly or indirectly to survival. Within the case of humans in distinct, worth also relates for the good quality of that survival inside the form of well-being" (Damasio, 2010, pp. 47?8). This final sentence is important, insofar as it recognizes that, for creatures as complicated and interrelated as we are, our primitive values include things like not just upkeep of bodily equilibrium necessary for life, but additionally upkeep of social and cultural equilibrium inside larger communities. Mainly because the focus of my argument will not be directly on values, I will not elaborate Damasio's extensive and nuanced treatment on the origin and improvement of human values (see Damasio, 2003). I emphasize the pervasiveness of value only to emphasize that understanding is irreducibly value-laden and tied to our specific environments, both physical and social/cultural. Understanding is just not just a matter of ideas and propositions capturing some aspect from the world; rather, it is actually a matter of appropriately situating and enabling purposive action on the planet, relative to our wellbeing. I also wish to highlight the way in which values very first emerge from our bodily, interpersonal, and communal requirements, that are realized mostly in and by way of our bodily activities. In quick, "the values that humans attribute to objects and activities would bear some relation, regardless of how indirect or remote, towards the two following situations: initially, the general upkeep of living tissue inside the homeostatic variety appropriate to its existing context; second, the distinct regulation required for the approach to operate within the sector from the homeostatic variety connected with well-being relative to the existing context" (Damasio, 2010,p. 49). Note that the "current context" referred to right here would ordinarily be not merely our physical surroundings, but equally our interpersonal and communal relations.Emotional Dimensions of UnderstandingThe next (i.e., fourth) characteristic of our embodied understanding is so vital that it deserves its personal separate heading. The tendency to regard understanding as an intellectual, cognitive, conceptual, or propositional activity has led towards the downplaying or perhaps denial of any role for emotion and feeling. On the face of it, such a separation is ludicrous, but which has not stopped committed cognitivists from excluding emotions from the domain of understanding, or even from relating to feelings as contrary to acts of understanding. Nothing may very well be farther in the truth. To find out immediately why this dismissal of emotion is such a devastating mistake, we want a brief consideration in the nature and function of emotions in humans (as well as other animals). Right here once again, Damasio's operate has been really influential, based on his substantial research around the role of feelings and feelings in the formation of self, the emergence of consciousness, and also the nature of our values. The entire story of feelings, feelings, and their neural a. |
− | - |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 17:45, 14 กรกฎาคม 2564
The third essential point is that it really is constantly within the context of organism-environment transactions that values arise and influence behavior. Our encounter is value-laden all of the way down towards the primitive emergence with the values essential for life upkeep. Damasio concludes, "I see value as indelibly tied to want, and require as tied to life. The valuations we establish in every day social and cultural activities possess a direct and indirect connection with homeostasis.... Worth relates directly or indirectly to survival. Within the case of humans in distinct, worth also relates for the good quality of that survival inside the form of well-being" (Damasio, 2010, pp. 47?8). This final sentence is important, insofar as it recognizes that, for creatures as complicated and interrelated as we are, our primitive values include things like not just upkeep of bodily equilibrium necessary for life, but additionally upkeep of social and cultural equilibrium inside larger communities. Mainly because the focus of my argument will not be directly on values, I will not elaborate Damasio's extensive and nuanced treatment on the origin and improvement of human values (see Damasio, 2003). I emphasize the pervasiveness of value only to emphasize that understanding is irreducibly value-laden and tied to our specific environments, both physical and social/cultural. Understanding is just not just a matter of ideas and propositions capturing some aspect from the world; rather, it is actually a matter of appropriately situating and enabling purposive action on the planet, relative to our wellbeing. I also wish to highlight the way in which values very first emerge from our bodily, interpersonal, and communal requirements, that are realized mostly in and by way of our bodily activities. In quick, "the values that humans attribute to objects and activities would bear some relation, regardless of how indirect or remote, towards the two following situations: initially, the general upkeep of living tissue inside the homeostatic variety appropriate to its existing context; second, the distinct regulation required for the approach to operate within the sector from the homeostatic variety connected with well-being relative to the existing context" (Damasio, 2010,p. 49). Note that the "current context" referred to right here would ordinarily be not merely our physical surroundings, but equally our interpersonal and communal relations.Emotional Dimensions of UnderstandingThe next (i.e., fourth) characteristic of our embodied understanding is so vital that it deserves its personal separate heading. The tendency to regard understanding as an intellectual, cognitive, conceptual, or propositional activity has led towards the downplaying or perhaps denial of any role for emotion and feeling. On the face of it, such a separation is ludicrous, but which has not stopped committed cognitivists from excluding emotions from the domain of understanding, or even from relating to feelings as contrary to acts of understanding. Nothing may very well be farther in the truth. To find out immediately why this dismissal of emotion is such a devastating mistake, we want a brief consideration in the nature and function of emotions in humans (as well as other animals). Right here once again, Damasio's operate has been really influential, based on his substantial research around the role of feelings and feelings in the formation of self, the emergence of consciousness, and also the nature of our values. The entire story of feelings, feelings, and their neural a.