ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
ล
ล
แถว 1: แถว 1:
−
Having said that there was no important difference in sexual identity across the groups possibly because of the perceived importance of penis size to girls by heterosexual men [29]. The frequency of homosexual males was on the other hand fairly higher in all three groups. There could possibly be a bias within the recruitment of homosexual men who may have been additional interested than heterosexual men in volunteering for our study. It may as a result be essential to replicate the study in exclusively homosexual guys. One particular could possibly count on the mean age of males losing their virginity to become larger for those with BDD influenced by their greater avoidance of intimacy. The non-significant obtaining could also be explained by the BDD and SPA group issues obtaining been initiated during or post initially sexual encounter, despite the fact that 1 can only hypothesize at this point this could be additional researched in future. It is actually surprising that there was no substantial distinction involving the groups' mean numbers of sexual partners and frequency of sexual intercourse per month despite the fact that this may be a Sort two error. One may have expected guys with BDD who had been concerned about their penis size to possess had much less sexual partners and also a reduce frequency of sexual intercourse monthly provided their larger reported avoidance and safety-seeking behaviors in comparison with controls. Men with penis size issues might be engaging in as many sexual encounters as men without having concerns to get a variety of different factors. For instance, males with penis size issues could seek sexual encounters (i) as a way to seek a lot more opportunities to compare the size of their penis with other individuals (if homosexual) as a kind of "checking," (ii) as a way to seek acceptance or reassurance from others that their size is adequate--another safety-seeking behavior or (iii) their sexual drive could over-ride psychosocial processes that reduce the functioning of these guys in other important regions of life. Additionally, modern technology which include world-wide-web dating websites could be increasing possibilities for males to seek out sexual partners with no the social interactions that may well have previously hindered their ability to make a sexual relationship. In fact, two guys with BDD from the present sample did freely comment that websites and mobile phone applications that are aimed at getting "quick fix sexual encounters" had produced them really feel that any humiliation felt from comments on their penis size might be quick lived when engaging in purely one-time sexual encounters. Nevertheless, they are of course all only hypotheses, and further research is required to investigate these possibilities. It is actually of interest that the [https://www.medchemexpress.com/INCB-024360.html Epacadostat References] current sample did not differ in levels of pornography access or masturbation. By way of example, prior findings indicated that the majority of males with penis size issues are comparing their size with pictures they see in pornography, which contributes for the maintenance of their BDD as a safety-seeking behavior. Therefore concerned males might not be watching pornography purely for sexual gratification. On the other hand, of note, web statistics now report that pornography web-sites are among one of the most often visited web sites worldwide [30], and hence it is conceivable that watching pornogra.
+
Obility limitations) which kept them from getting the solution to shop
 +
Obility limitations) which kept them from obtaining the solution to shop further from house. As an example, this shopper explains why she shops close to dwelling: "It is quite important to me, the closeness from the supermarket. Simply because I've an elderly mother at home. My time period for me to obtain from operate to point A is very limited". Participants spoke of knowing their each day travel pathways and usually attempted to finish errands, which includes meals purchasing, along established, familiar routes. 1 participant stated: "We are dropping our child off at a particular activity I will stop at the shop, you go around the errand. You perform it into your schedule, for scheduling purposes it truly is more handy if it is close by along your travelling path". In these situations comfort had much less to perform with distance from property and much more to perform with being situated near properties of relatives, function places, youngster activity locations, or along other timesaving routes traveled for other reasons. By way of example, oneMean (SD)aTable 2 Descriptive information on participants' food buying patterns more than 4 weeks periodVariable Typical quantity of meals purchasing trips Average variety of stores usedb b15.22 (11.8) six (3.0)  407.08 ( 222.34)Typical quantity spent per household overb Usual mode of travel to food shopcCar (personal car or riding with a person else) Walking Public transportation Typical sum of travel for all food shopping (mi) Typical distance to most frequented stored (mi) Most frequented store was supermarket/grocery Most frequented store within 1 mile from house Most frequented retailer inside 1 mile from dwelling or routine destinationa22 (63  ) 9 (26  ) five (14  )d34.9 (40.5) 1.8 (two.three) 27 (77  ) 20 (57  ) 27 (77  )or N ( ) where specified b primarily based on imply of person shopper averages more than the four week period c Usual travel mode was determined by asking standard mode of travel to most frequented store d estimated primarily based on Euclidian distances from residence locationDiSantis et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2016) 13:Page six ofparticipant completed all of her meals shopping far from household but close to her church. She noted that the retailers near her church offer comfort: "I shop there only for convenience due to the fact I am in that vicinity", but also said that she would shop near dwelling if she felt the shops have been as "bright" and "clean" as the retailers near church. She stated "you want anything in your neighborhood where you could frequent". Therefore, the perceived quality from the shops near her property was an more factor in her decision to shop close to a routine destination outside of her dwelling neighborhood. A pattern of purchasing along established pathways near either residence or other routine destinations was observed across the sample. For example, one participant shopped at ten retailers more than four weeks; 4 stores have been within 1.0 Euclidian mile from household. All the remaining stores had been inside 1 mile of a routine location. This participant, who did not have access to a car, also related purchasing along pathways to public transportation routes. For instance, she described a certain shop on a public transportation route to be the most easy during the work week, stating "...the way I go dwelling will be the El [subway].

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 01:02, 1 กันยายน 2564

Obility limitations) which kept them from getting the solution to shop Obility limitations) which kept them from obtaining the solution to shop further from house. As an example, this shopper explains why she shops close to dwelling: "It is quite important to me, the closeness from the supermarket. Simply because I've an elderly mother at home. My time period for me to obtain from operate to point A is very limited". Participants spoke of knowing their each day travel pathways and usually attempted to finish errands, which includes meals purchasing, along established, familiar routes. 1 participant stated: "We are dropping our child off at a particular activity I will stop at the shop, you go around the errand. You perform it into your schedule, for scheduling purposes it truly is more handy if it is close by along your travelling path". In these situations comfort had much less to perform with distance from property and much more to perform with being situated near properties of relatives, function places, youngster activity locations, or along other timesaving routes traveled for other reasons. By way of example, oneMean (SD)aTable 2 Descriptive information on participants' food buying patterns more than 4 weeks periodVariable Typical quantity of meals purchasing trips Average variety of stores usedb b15.22 (11.8) six (3.0) 407.08 ( 222.34)Typical quantity spent per household overb Usual mode of travel to food shopcCar (personal car or riding with a person else) Walking Public transportation Typical sum of travel for all food shopping (mi) Typical distance to most frequented stored (mi) Most frequented store was supermarket/grocery Most frequented store within 1 mile from house Most frequented retailer inside 1 mile from dwelling or routine destinationa22 (63 ) 9 (26 ) five (14 )d34.9 (40.5) 1.8 (two.three) 27 (77 ) 20 (57 ) 27 (77 )or N ( ) where specified b primarily based on imply of person shopper averages more than the four week period c Usual travel mode was determined by asking standard mode of travel to most frequented store d estimated primarily based on Euclidian distances from residence locationDiSantis et al. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (2016) 13:Page six ofparticipant completed all of her meals shopping far from household but close to her church. She noted that the retailers near her church offer comfort: "I shop there only for convenience due to the fact I am in that vicinity", but also said that she would shop near dwelling if she felt the shops have been as "bright" and "clean" as the retailers near church. She stated "you want anything in your neighborhood where you could frequent". Therefore, the perceived quality from the shops near her property was an more factor in her decision to shop close to a routine destination outside of her dwelling neighborhood. A pattern of purchasing along established pathways near either residence or other routine destinations was observed across the sample. For example, one participant shopped at ten retailers more than four weeks; 4 stores have been within 1.0 Euclidian mile from household. All the remaining stores had been inside 1 mile of a routine location. This participant, who did not have access to a car, also related purchasing along pathways to public transportation routes. For instance, she described a certain shop on a public transportation route to be the most easy during the work week, stating "...the way I go dwelling will be the El [subway].

ดึงข้อมูลจาก "https://wiki.surinsanghasociety.com/index.php?title=หน้าหลัก&oldid=354039"