ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
ล
ล
แถว 1: แถว 1:
−
At in regards to the similar time, the larval ciliary cirrus and an amniotic "larval pore" come to be apparent under what utilized to become the posterior larval lobe (now situated between the two transverse ciliary bands) (Figs. 5a and e2). The larval pore is positioned just vegetal for the larval cirrus, and opens through the larval epidermis for the outdoors (Figs. 6a and 7f ). By the fourth day, typically, the lobes and lappets diminish and become indistinguishable, and corresponding halves of each and every ciliary band make contact with every other (Fig. 6c-d), using the ciliary band segments of the larval lobes forming a continuous anterior transverse ciliary band (the "prototroch"), and those in the lappets forming a continuous posterior transverse ciliary band (the "telotroch") (Figs. 3g and 6d). Because the ciliary bands reorganize, the "arcs" of muscle tracing the vanishing lappets start to widen their curve, plus the sides in the "arcs" extend towards every single other (like the handles of every single jump rope are getting held additional from each other, but closer for the handles from the opposite jump rope).Hunt and Maslakova Frontiers in Zoology (2017) 14:Page 7 ofabcd cd cd gt gtcdtdtdacapcd gtacdgt td tdatdtdFig. 4 Invagination of cephalic and trunk discs in larvae of Micrura sp. "dark." a1-a2 are confocal projections of a specimen stained with phalloidin (white) and propidium iodide (orange) and sectioned transversely (from apical to vegetal); anterior lobe is up. a1. A 1.95 m slab showing the cephalic discs (cd) and also the gut (gt). a2. Identical person as on a1, a 1.95 m slab showing the trunk discs (td) invaginating from the larval epidermis. b. A diagram (apical view) summarizing a1-a2 (apical organ omitted for clarity). c. A diagram from the identical stage as on a-b, displaying a frontal view (apical up). Horizontal lines show approximate levels with the sections in a1-a2. Scale bars 50 mThe circumferential muscles underlying the "telotroch" weave via and around the widened curves, encircling the posterior end on the larva (Fig. 7c-d). At some point, the sides in the "arcs" overlap each other, forming a cross of muscle at either finish of the establishing juvenile (Fig. 7a-d), and the widened curves with the "arcs" dropped in the "prototroch" muscles are a lot more completely incorporated into establishing circumferential muscles underlying the "telotroch" (Fig. 7c-d). Other muscle fibers extend involving the "prototroch" and "telotroch," further interconnecting the musculature. The dorsal rudiment becomes bi-layered, and spreads underneath the larval epidermis across the dorsal surface of your gut (Fig. 5b-c), and also the cephalic discs envelop the proboscis rudiment as they fuse about it (Figure 5e1). The cephalic discs fuse with each other near the gut first, then continue to fuse anteriorly and about the proboscis into the fourth day (Fig. 8, More file 4 -- Movie 4), forming the headrudiment. The trunk discs fuse with each other plus the posterior finish in the dorsal rudiment, forming the trunk rudiment. The dorsal rudiment also extends anteriorly more than the gut towards the fusing cephalic discs. The cerebral organs close off in the gut, and are enveloped by the head and trunk rudiments as they fuse together about the opening from the gut, forming a toroidal juvenile rudiment (Fig.
+
Ble to provide the range of movement of upper limb joints
 +
Ble to supply the variety of movement of upper limb joints which include shoulder and elbow angle making use of internal robot measures, hence proximal assessment such as intra-limb coordination which is useful to know the interaction of upper limb elements have to be inferred on the endeffector quality of performing synergistic tasks [39] such as circle drawing and shape tracing. Exoskeleton robots on the contrary are constructed side-byside with the upper limb which provides isolated joint manage and higher variety of assessment parameters as proximal segments are being interfaced to the system. Having said that, precise coupling in the robot kinematics and upper limb kinematics are required for the internal robot measurement to become feasible. This implies that the transformation of kinematic parameters in robot functional frame to anatomical frame ought to be out there or a minimum of controlled throughout assessment session for a helpful clinicalinterpretation. This can be realized by designing specific joint configuration that deemed the robot as statically determined [67,69] and provide technique of linkages that let the movement of anatomical segment's center of rotation as the movement happens [70]. The handle scheme in the rehabilitation robot plays a vital function in giving assessment data. Although impedance controlled robots like MITMANUS/InMotion and ARM-Guide offer stable dynamic interaction with stiff environment like inside the case of targeted movement and shape tracing, report have shown that even low-impedance end-point movement is susceptible to robot's intrinsic dynamics [71]. The consequence is remarkably consistent 2D surfaces emerged from trial-to-trial and amongst subjects which would have an effect on the capacity of your robot to provide meaningful assessment. In contrast, admittance controlled robots like MIME and ARMin has higher level accuracy and impart negligible level of inertia through totally free reaching process. Even so, to accommodate the complexity, the technique as an example employs harmonic drive actuators [69] exactly where considerable friction exists when the robot is in passive state. As a result, assessments are realized during counterbalanced (transparent) state which hence relies on the overall performance in the robot's controller to distinguish user's overall performance from the influence of robot dynamics. Beyond the robot structure, the feasible therapy variation may influence the range of assessment information provided as well. Whilst passive assessment session demands backdrivability in the robot, user's share of control in active-assisted and resistive rehabilitation session is often advantageous for continuous assessment. It is actually critical to emphasize even so, that the robotic method has to be in a position to distinguish the user's contribution throughout the therapy in the sum of external forces which incorporates gravity, inertia, centrifugal and Coriolis forces, passive mechanical forces and forces associated to muscle activity [72]. In summary, it could be concluded that optimal assessment data is usually supplied solely by the robot without the need of external motion capture when no perturbation either from internal dynamics of the robot or gravitational loading is guaranteed and the kinematic coupling among the robot and user is controlled.Kinematic parameters evaluating movement qualityThe assessment conducted in studies of robot-assisted rehabilitation reviewed within this paper typically focuses on end-point movement except for parameters defining joint range limits, intra-limb and inter-limb coordinat.

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 15:09, 2 กันยายน 2564

Ble to provide the range of movement of upper limb joints Ble to supply the variety of movement of upper limb joints which include shoulder and elbow angle making use of internal robot measures, hence proximal assessment such as intra-limb coordination which is useful to know the interaction of upper limb elements have to be inferred on the endeffector quality of performing synergistic tasks [39] such as circle drawing and shape tracing. Exoskeleton robots on the contrary are constructed side-byside with the upper limb which provides isolated joint manage and higher variety of assessment parameters as proximal segments are being interfaced to the system. Having said that, precise coupling in the robot kinematics and upper limb kinematics are required for the internal robot measurement to become feasible. This implies that the transformation of kinematic parameters in robot functional frame to anatomical frame ought to be out there or a minimum of controlled throughout assessment session for a helpful clinicalinterpretation. This can be realized by designing specific joint configuration that deemed the robot as statically determined [67,69] and provide technique of linkages that let the movement of anatomical segment's center of rotation as the movement happens [70]. The handle scheme in the rehabilitation robot plays a vital function in giving assessment data. Although impedance controlled robots like MITMANUS/InMotion and ARM-Guide offer stable dynamic interaction with stiff environment like inside the case of targeted movement and shape tracing, report have shown that even low-impedance end-point movement is susceptible to robot's intrinsic dynamics [71]. The consequence is remarkably consistent 2D surfaces emerged from trial-to-trial and amongst subjects which would have an effect on the capacity of your robot to provide meaningful assessment. In contrast, admittance controlled robots like MIME and ARMin has higher level accuracy and impart negligible level of inertia through totally free reaching process. Even so, to accommodate the complexity, the technique as an example employs harmonic drive actuators [69] exactly where considerable friction exists when the robot is in passive state. As a result, assessments are realized during counterbalanced (transparent) state which hence relies on the overall performance in the robot's controller to distinguish user's overall performance from the influence of robot dynamics. Beyond the robot structure, the feasible therapy variation may influence the range of assessment information provided as well. Whilst passive assessment session demands backdrivability in the robot, user's share of control in active-assisted and resistive rehabilitation session is often advantageous for continuous assessment. It is actually critical to emphasize even so, that the robotic method has to be in a position to distinguish the user's contribution throughout the therapy in the sum of external forces which incorporates gravity, inertia, centrifugal and Coriolis forces, passive mechanical forces and forces associated to muscle activity [72]. In summary, it could be concluded that optimal assessment data is usually supplied solely by the robot without the need of external motion capture when no perturbation either from internal dynamics of the robot or gravitational loading is guaranteed and the kinematic coupling among the robot and user is controlled.Kinematic parameters evaluating movement qualityThe assessment conducted in studies of robot-assisted rehabilitation reviewed within this paper typically focuses on end-point movement except for parameters defining joint range limits, intra-limb and inter-limb coordinat.

ดึงข้อมูลจาก "https://wiki.surinsanghasociety.com/index.php?title=หน้าหลัก&oldid=360637"