ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
ล |
||
แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
− | + | (2012a) located that, rather than boosting learning overall performance, social reward (smiling or angry faces) madewww.frontiersin.orgOctober 2014 | Volume five | Report 1154 |Colombo et al.Feedback, norm learning, and tippinglearning slower, and usually significantly less efficient, in comparison to nonsocial reward including funds. It ought to be noted that Hurlemann et al. (2010) and Lin et al. (2012a) have been examining fundamentally different questions, which may explain the distinction in their final results. In Hurlemann et al.'s (2010) study, participants made use of feedback to find out the category membership of an abstract string of numbers, whereas in Lin et al.'s (2012a) study participants played an instrumental finding out activity exactly where they had to learn to select the slot machine linked using the highest probability of a optimistic valenced outcome. So, based on the process, social stimuli might have distinct, in some cases opposite, effects on learning overall performance. In specific, it remains controversial irrespective of whether participants in an associative learning activity getting feedback in the form of facial expressions find out a social norm more efficiently than participants who are supplied with non-social, cognitive feedback. Our study contributes to preceding literature by examining a lot more closely the relative effect of social (happy and angry faces) and non-social feedback (tick and cross marks) on mastering, and by testing the hypothesis that social feedback leads to more generous behavior, within the context of the Tipping Game. This job tapped into a fundamental mechanism underlying the ontogeny of social cognition (Reeb-Sutherland et al., 2012), although permitting us to examine the effects of social, as opposed to non-social, feedback on mastering and decision-making. The Tipping Game shares a number of functions with other reinforcement studying tasks, and so the connected modeling framework can be made use of to quantitatively characterize the behavioral final results of each healthy young people--as in our study--as nicely as clinical and neurological individuals (Lin et al., 2012b). Inside the present study, modeling final results helped to disentangle how info carried by specific types of feedback stimuli may interact with economic interest when individuals are learning a social norm. The originality from the Tipping Game may be the social context and social feedback that it involves. These contribute for the higher ecological validity and naturalness of our task, which distinguish it from the ones previously used in studies using facial expressions as predictors of monetary reward (e.g., Averbeck and Duchaine, 2009; Hurlemann et al., 2010; around the significance from the ecological validity in these types of tasks, see Lin et al., 2012b, p. 7).EXPERIMENTMETHODSParticipantsInitially, participants filled out five questionnaires: the "Empathy Quotient" (EQ) questionnaire (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004), one version of the "Reading the Mind within the Eyes" test (Baron-Cohen et al., 1997), the "Self Report Altruism" questionnaire (Rushton et al., 1981), the "Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire" (SPSRQ; Torrubia et al., 2001), and the "Behavioral Inhibition/Approach" (BIS/BAS) questionnaire (Carver and White, 1994). These questionnaires measured [https://www.medchemexpress.com/X-396.html Ensartinib In Vivo] respectively the level of empathy, mentalizing, altruism, and punishment and reward sensitivity of your participants. Just after the questionnaires had been completed, directions have been offered in regards to the Tipping Game and i. |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 00:12, 25 มิถุนายน 2564
(2012a) located that, rather than boosting learning overall performance, social reward (smiling or angry faces) madewww.frontiersin.orgOctober 2014 | Volume five | Report 1154 |Colombo et al.Feedback, norm learning, and tippinglearning slower, and usually significantly less efficient, in comparison to nonsocial reward including funds. It ought to be noted that Hurlemann et al. (2010) and Lin et al. (2012a) have been examining fundamentally different questions, which may explain the distinction in their final results. In Hurlemann et al.'s (2010) study, participants made use of feedback to find out the category membership of an abstract string of numbers, whereas in Lin et al.'s (2012a) study participants played an instrumental finding out activity exactly where they had to learn to select the slot machine linked using the highest probability of a optimistic valenced outcome. So, based on the process, social stimuli might have distinct, in some cases opposite, effects on learning overall performance. In specific, it remains controversial irrespective of whether participants in an associative learning activity getting feedback in the form of facial expressions find out a social norm more efficiently than participants who are supplied with non-social, cognitive feedback. Our study contributes to preceding literature by examining a lot more closely the relative effect of social (happy and angry faces) and non-social feedback (tick and cross marks) on mastering, and by testing the hypothesis that social feedback leads to more generous behavior, within the context of the Tipping Game. This job tapped into a fundamental mechanism underlying the ontogeny of social cognition (Reeb-Sutherland et al., 2012), although permitting us to examine the effects of social, as opposed to non-social, feedback on mastering and decision-making. The Tipping Game shares a number of functions with other reinforcement studying tasks, and so the connected modeling framework can be made use of to quantitatively characterize the behavioral final results of each healthy young people--as in our study--as nicely as clinical and neurological individuals (Lin et al., 2012b). Inside the present study, modeling final results helped to disentangle how info carried by specific types of feedback stimuli may interact with economic interest when individuals are learning a social norm. The originality from the Tipping Game may be the social context and social feedback that it involves. These contribute for the higher ecological validity and naturalness of our task, which distinguish it from the ones previously used in studies using facial expressions as predictors of monetary reward (e.g., Averbeck and Duchaine, 2009; Hurlemann et al., 2010; around the significance from the ecological validity in these types of tasks, see Lin et al., 2012b, p. 7).EXPERIMENTMETHODSParticipantsInitially, participants filled out five questionnaires: the "Empathy Quotient" (EQ) questionnaire (Baron-Cohen and Wheelwright, 2004), one version of the "Reading the Mind within the Eyes" test (Baron-Cohen et al., 1997), the "Self Report Altruism" questionnaire (Rushton et al., 1981), the "Sensitivity to Punishment and Sensitivity to Reward Questionnaire" (SPSRQ; Torrubia et al., 2001), and the "Behavioral Inhibition/Approach" (BIS/BAS) questionnaire (Carver and White, 1994). These questionnaires measured Ensartinib In Vivo respectively the level of empathy, mentalizing, altruism, and punishment and reward sensitivity of your participants. Just after the questionnaires had been completed, directions have been offered in regards to the Tipping Game and i.