ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
ล
ล
แถว 1: แถว 1:
−
Cted that temporal discounting alternatives could be far better represented by a
+
(C) Representative images of cells 8 h just after thymidine washout, labeled with antibodies against giantin (green) for the Golgi complex, and with DRAQ5 (blue) for cell cycle phase, and labeled with antibodies against AurA (red, arrow). (D and E) The cells had been either nonmicroinjected or microinjected 1 h right after thymidine washout with recombinant GST (GSTinj; eight mg/ml), recombinant SBD (SBDinj; 8 two mg/ml), or recombinant GRASP65 (GR65inj; eight 0 mg/ml), and with FITCconjugated dextran as microinjection marker. For the noninjected cells, eight h just after thymidine washout they have been treated with vehicle  or 0.25 M MLN8054 (MLN). The cells had been then processed eight h, ten h (SBDinjected cells only) and 12 h (all the cells) after thymidine washout, for immunofluorescence below confocal microscopy with antibodies against AurA and with DRAQ5 (for cell cycle phase). (D) Representative pictures of noninjected and SBDinjected cells. (E) The relative percentages of AurA ositive cells have been calculated according to the relevant nonmicroinjected cells around the very same coverslip (see Materials and Techniques), or to cells treated with vehicle . All photos had been acquired at maximal resolution, with fixed imaging circumstances. Bars, five m. Quantification information are indicates SD from two (B) and 3 (E) [http://www.hzswyw.com/comment/html/?411050.html PLCc1 and Akt induced by Ang II and PDGF.17,30 Ang II] independent experiments, each and every carried out in duplicate. Extra than 200 cells had been microinjected for every situation. (F) Representative pictures of cells 12 h soon after thymidine washout, labeled with antibodies against pericentrin (green) as a centrosome marker, and with AuroraA (red). Insets are greater magnification views of representative centrosomes. Equal regions had been used to select the centrosome regions (circle) and also a noncentrosome region using a equivalent background (dashed circle). (G) Fluorescence intensity (a.u., arbitrary units) of centrosomeassociated AurA per cell was quantified by utilizing LSM 710 ZEN 2008 SP1 (see Components and Solutions) in cells that had been treated as described inside a and injected with FITCdextran alone (Dxinj) or within the presence of SBD (SBDinj) or GRASP65 (GR65inj). 1 data set representative of 3 independent experiments is shown as a scatter plot. More than 250 cells where injected and analyzed. (H) Fluorescence intensity SEM of your samples reported in (G) that showed abovebackground fluorescence levels of centrosomeassociated AurA. Twotailed Student's t tests were applied for the data (p 0.005; p 0.001). Bar, five m.of Golgi fragmentation resulted within a persistent and early reduction in AurA [http://ns.itws.cn/qnhospital/comment/html/?352721.html De2phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) treated trypsin was from Worthington Biochemical] recruitment for the centrosomes. Therapy of synchronized cells for four h together with the AurA inhibitor (0.25 M MLN8054) didn't affect AurA recruitment for the centrosome (Figure 4E, MLN), indicating that the kinase activity of AurA is not essential for its localization. Next, we assessed the effect with the inhibition of Golgi fragmentation around the fluorescence intensity of AurA in a region of interest defined by pericentrinstained centrosomes (Figure 4F, circle). As expected, the injection of either SBD or GRASP65 lowered the fraction of cells with abovebackground levels of AurA on the centrosomes, compared with dextraninjected cells (Figure 4G). In addition, this quantitative analysis of AurA recruitment showed that the injection of your blockers of Golgi fragmentation also significantly decreased the total AurA fluo.
−
Cted that temporal discounting options will be greater represented by a hyperbolic than exponential curve (Rachlin et al., 1991; Green et al., 1997; Johnson and Bickel, 2002; Myerson et al., 2003; Robles and Vargas, 2007; Steinberg et al., 2009). We expected considerable associations involving the four indicators of temporal discounting and that reaction instances would be greater in the indifference point choice than in the other choices. The preference to get a larger delayed reward was also anticipated to be drastically linked with higher cognitive abilities, dispositional tendencies toward much more persistence in pondering and CFCs, and significantly less substance use and gambling behavior.Components and MethodsParticipantsThe final sample consisted of 99 participants (37 males and 62 females) from an undergraduate university sample. The imply age with the sample was 20.72 years (SD = two.36, range = 18?30 years of age). Participants had been recruited on a university campus, and each volunteer received  15 for 1 h of participation. As inclusion criteria, participants had been needed to possess English as a 1st language or have already been schooled in English and should have spoken English for at least ten years. Initial year undergraduate students comprised 29.three  of your sample, 32.three  were second year undergraduates, 12.1  have been third year undergraduates, 18.two have been fourth year undergraduates, and 8  had graduated or have been post-undergraduate continuing education students.Measures Temporal Discounting TaskA staircase version of a temporal discounting decision activity adapted from Rachlin et al. (1991) was utilized within this study. This task was administered on a personal computer working with the plan Media Lab. This activity involved creating many hypothetical choices amongst an quick reward plus a delayed fixed reward. There have been 5 delay periods (1 month, 1, 5, ten, and 25 years) crossed with two reward magnitudes ( 100 and  10,000), both withinsubject variables. The instant variable reward changed within a sequential staircase manner by elements of 10. As an example, inside the  one hundred reward magnitude block, the immediate reward changed by 10 increments ( ten,  20,  30,  40,  50,  60,  70,  80,  90,Associations between Behavioral Outcomes and Temporal DiscountingThere can be a sizable literature to suggest that temporal discounting is related with extra risky behavior. Temporal discounting studies have shown that cigarette smokers (Bickel et al., 1999), substance abusers with gambling problems (Petry and Casarella,Frontiers in Psychology | www.frontiersin.orgJune 2015 | Volume 6 | ArticleBasile and ToplakTemporal discounting and individual differencesand  one hundred). Each and every participant created a total of 100 alternatives (two reward magnitudes ?five delay periods ?10 trials at each reward magnitude and delay period)1 . For the temporal discounting process, our criteria to decide the indifference point was a switch followed by two constant selections following the switch (primarily based on Hurst et al., 2010). We didn't identify any non-systematic responders around the temporal discounting process. It ought to also be noted that the participants had been individually tested with an experimenter, plus the experimenter would have clarified any unusual responding through the testing session. The reaction time for each and every choice within the temporal discounting activity was also collected. Four sets of dependent variables have been derived from this task.
 

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 01:56, 19 กรกฎาคม 2564

(C) Representative images of cells 8 h just after thymidine washout, labeled with antibodies against giantin (green) for the Golgi complex, and with DRAQ5 (blue) for cell cycle phase, and labeled with antibodies against AurA (red, arrow). (D and E) The cells had been either nonmicroinjected or microinjected 1 h right after thymidine washout with recombinant GST (GSTinj; eight mg/ml), recombinant SBD (SBDinj; 8 two mg/ml), or recombinant GRASP65 (GR65inj; eight 0 mg/ml), and with FITCconjugated dextran as microinjection marker. For the noninjected cells, eight h just after thymidine washout they have been treated with vehicle or 0.25 M MLN8054 (MLN). The cells had been then processed eight h, ten h (SBDinjected cells only) and 12 h (all the cells) after thymidine washout, for immunofluorescence below confocal microscopy with antibodies against AurA and with DRAQ5 (for cell cycle phase). (D) Representative pictures of noninjected and SBDinjected cells. (E) The relative percentages of AurA ositive cells have been calculated according to the relevant nonmicroinjected cells around the very same coverslip (see Materials and Techniques), or to cells treated with vehicle . All photos had been acquired at maximal resolution, with fixed imaging circumstances. Bars, five m. Quantification information are indicates SD from two (B) and 3 (E) PLCc1 and Akt induced by Ang II and PDGF.17,30 Ang II independent experiments, each and every carried out in duplicate. Extra than 200 cells had been microinjected for every situation. (F) Representative pictures of cells 12 h soon after thymidine washout, labeled with antibodies against pericentrin (green) as a centrosome marker, and with AuroraA (red). Insets are greater magnification views of representative centrosomes. Equal regions had been used to select the centrosome regions (circle) and also a noncentrosome region using a equivalent background (dashed circle). (G) Fluorescence intensity (a.u., arbitrary units) of centrosomeassociated AurA per cell was quantified by utilizing LSM 710 ZEN 2008 SP1 (see Components and Solutions) in cells that had been treated as described inside a and injected with FITCdextran alone (Dxinj) or within the presence of SBD (SBDinj) or GRASP65 (GR65inj). 1 data set representative of 3 independent experiments is shown as a scatter plot. More than 250 cells where injected and analyzed. (H) Fluorescence intensity SEM of your samples reported in (G) that showed abovebackground fluorescence levels of centrosomeassociated AurA. Twotailed Student's t tests were applied for the data (p 0.005; p 0.001). Bar, five m.of Golgi fragmentation resulted within a persistent and early reduction in AurA De2phenylethyl chloromethyl ketone (TPCK) treated trypsin was from Worthington Biochemical recruitment for the centrosomes. Therapy of synchronized cells for four h together with the AurA inhibitor (0.25 M MLN8054) didn't affect AurA recruitment for the centrosome (Figure 4E, MLN), indicating that the kinase activity of AurA is not essential for its localization. Next, we assessed the effect with the inhibition of Golgi fragmentation around the fluorescence intensity of AurA in a region of interest defined by pericentrinstained centrosomes (Figure 4F, circle). As expected, the injection of either SBD or GRASP65 lowered the fraction of cells with abovebackground levels of AurA on the centrosomes, compared with dextraninjected cells (Figure 4G). In addition, this quantitative analysis of AurA recruitment showed that the injection of your blockers of Golgi fragmentation also significantly decreased the total AurA fluo.

ดึงข้อมูลจาก "https://wiki.surinsanghasociety.com/index.php?title=หน้าหลัก&oldid=190598"