ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
ล |
ล |
||
| แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
| − | + | In current studies a important association in between inhibition and math performance | |
| − | + | In current studies a substantial association between inhibition and math performance has been located (e.g., Gerst et al., 2015; Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). In two meta-analyses, shifting was linked with math abilities in major school-aged young children (Friso-van den Bos et al., 2013; Yeniad et al., 2013). A recent study by Gerst et al. (2015) also reported a considerable and good relation amongst math and shifting. A varying amount of study has been performed on the relation between cognitive measures of EF and spelling outcome, with most research on WM, and only a couple of on inhibition or shifting. Studies on WM in relation to spelling expertise show a good association (e.g., Jongejan et al., 2007; Malst t et al., 2012; Cardoso et al., 2013; Fischbach et al., 2013; Pre er et al., 2013; Becker et al., 2014; Re et al., 2014; Bexkens et al., 2015). Each inhibition (Altemeier et al., 2008) and shifting (Altemeier et al., 2008) have also been positively linked to spelling in 1st to fourth graders. Despite the fact that cognitive EF functionality is associated to cognitive performance in math and spelling, it remains unclear no matter whether cognitive measures of EF would be the most effective choice to clarify the a lot more difficult, a lot more demanding, and much less structuredperformance conditions at school exactly where aspects like fear and motivation also play an essential function. Cognitive EF measures often neglect the effects of motivation, goals, and beliefs on EF, and their use in predicting quality of cognitive learning is difficult by job impurity complications (Salthouse et al., 2003). EF functioning is thought to be visible in daily life whenever organizing, issue solving, inhibition or troubleshooting is challenged. One particular may possibly ask no matter whether every day executive functioning at college or at residence is also associated to math and spelling functionality. This would indicate the pervasive influence of EF on school overall performance on a number of levels of handle. Behavioral ratings of EF had been created to assess the application of EF skills in common performance circumstances at home or at school and are assumed to become a lot more ecologically valid. Nonetheless, studies relating behavioral measures of EF to college achievement are restricted. A significant association among behavioral WM complications and poorer math outcome has been reported by some (Clark et al., 2010; Gerst et al., 2015), but not by others (Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). Behavioral inhibitory complications have been found to show either a considerable association (Clark et al., 2010; Gerst et al., 2015) or no association with math (Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). Behavioral complications with shifting have also been connected to poorer math outcome (Gerst et al., 2015; Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). To our knowledge, only 1 study reported on the association involving spelling and behavioral EF (teacher report) and showed that behavioral aspects of memory, shifting, and inhibitory manage have been related to children's spelling outcome in kindergarten and first grade (Kent et al., 2014). Nonetheless, behavioral ratings are challenged by rater bias (e.g., the halo impact, central tendency bias, leniency bias) and situational specificity of behavior, resulting in low crossinformant agreement (Achenbach et al., 1987). | |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 11:02, 28 สิงหาคม 2564
In current studies a important association in between inhibition and math performance In current studies a substantial association between inhibition and math performance has been located (e.g., Gerst et al., 2015; Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). In two meta-analyses, shifting was linked with math abilities in major school-aged young children (Friso-van den Bos et al., 2013; Yeniad et al., 2013). A recent study by Gerst et al. (2015) also reported a considerable and good relation amongst math and shifting. A varying amount of study has been performed on the relation between cognitive measures of EF and spelling outcome, with most research on WM, and only a couple of on inhibition or shifting. Studies on WM in relation to spelling expertise show a good association (e.g., Jongejan et al., 2007; Malst t et al., 2012; Cardoso et al., 2013; Fischbach et al., 2013; Pre er et al., 2013; Becker et al., 2014; Re et al., 2014; Bexkens et al., 2015). Each inhibition (Altemeier et al., 2008) and shifting (Altemeier et al., 2008) have also been positively linked to spelling in 1st to fourth graders. Despite the fact that cognitive EF functionality is associated to cognitive performance in math and spelling, it remains unclear no matter whether cognitive measures of EF would be the most effective choice to clarify the a lot more difficult, a lot more demanding, and much less structuredperformance conditions at school exactly where aspects like fear and motivation also play an essential function. Cognitive EF measures often neglect the effects of motivation, goals, and beliefs on EF, and their use in predicting quality of cognitive learning is difficult by job impurity complications (Salthouse et al., 2003). EF functioning is thought to be visible in daily life whenever organizing, issue solving, inhibition or troubleshooting is challenged. One particular may possibly ask no matter whether every day executive functioning at college or at residence is also associated to math and spelling functionality. This would indicate the pervasive influence of EF on school overall performance on a number of levels of handle. Behavioral ratings of EF had been created to assess the application of EF skills in common performance circumstances at home or at school and are assumed to become a lot more ecologically valid. Nonetheless, studies relating behavioral measures of EF to college achievement are restricted. A significant association among behavioral WM complications and poorer math outcome has been reported by some (Clark et al., 2010; Gerst et al., 2015), but not by others (Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). Behavioral inhibitory complications have been found to show either a considerable association (Clark et al., 2010; Gerst et al., 2015) or no association with math (Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). Behavioral complications with shifting have also been connected to poorer math outcome (Gerst et al., 2015; Ten Eycke and Dewey, 2016). To our knowledge, only 1 study reported on the association involving spelling and behavioral EF (teacher report) and showed that behavioral aspects of memory, shifting, and inhibitory manage have been related to children's spelling outcome in kindergarten and first grade (Kent et al., 2014). Nonetheless, behavioral ratings are challenged by rater bias (e.g., the halo impact, central tendency bias, leniency bias) and situational specificity of behavior, resulting in low crossinformant agreement (Achenbach et al., 1987).
