ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
แถว 1: แถว 1:
Le investment and work that goes into educating young people today in
+
Lenoir County was chosen because the setting for the Heart
Le investment and work that goes into educating young folks in IVQPs should be supported by research into promoting the development of competencies. In precisely such contexts, self-regulation and resilience have been identified as important elements which can figure out accomplishment or failure (Artuch, 2014). It can be important for social inclusion to be envisioned inside the wider context of mental health, well-being and recovery (Repper and Perkins, 2003). In Dweck (2009): "The twenty-first century will belong towards the passionate and resilient learners" (p. 9), and this most likely applies to atrisk students much more than it does to these in mainstream contexts.Kumpfer, and other people (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012), many authors have pursued the idea of promoting resilience in kids and young people who're otherwise seen as "vulnerable" (Pearce, 2011). Empirical study establishes 3 vital situations in the conceptualization of resilience: (a) expanding up in, or locating oneself in an adverse circumstance (generally subjective); (b) the availability of protective factors (internal and external), and (c) managing to adapt positively despite the knowledge of adversity (Gonz ez-Torres and Artuch, 2014). This optimistic adaptation, as Fergus and Zimmerman (2005) indicate, is really a resilient outcome, a approach to overcome a threat. Henderson and Milstein (2003, p. 26) generating clear reference for the educational sphere, define it as "...the capacity to spring back, rebound, successfully adapt in the face of adversity and develop social, academic and vocational competence despite exposure to severe stress or simply to the pressure that is inherent in today's world."Development in the ConstructThe construct resilience has been developed scientifically in four waves or generations of research (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012; O'Dougherty et al., 2013; Prince-Embury and Saklosfke, 2013) and in two distinct geographical settings (France and the USA). Other European authors outdoors France (Rutter, 2005, 2006, 2007) and Latin American authors (Kotliarenco et al., 1997) have also studied the notion, but the bulk of the literature comes from these two nations. Based on Masten's work (2004) "Resilience in creating systems: Progress and guarantee as the 4th wave rises," we can point to the existence of four stages within the analysis about resilience. The initial was enthusiastic about identifying a quick list of protective/buffering variables (internal and external) when facing threat and trauma. Internal elements for example high intelligence, development of appropriate coping techniques, optimism, difficulty solving, self-regulation have already been observed to act to safeguard men and women against adverse conditions (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012; Garc -Vesga and Dom guez-de la Ossa, 2013). Alternatively, parenting styles, family members structure and cohesiveness and teacher and peer relations belong towards the external protectors. Notwithstanding, it have to be kept in thoughts that no single factor promotes resilience in isolation (Grotberg, 1995; Fergus and Zimmerman, 2005). The second wave sought to understand how protective and risk variables interact inside the method of creating up resilience, and different models of resilience were developed (Fergus and Zimmerman, 2005; Beco , 2006). The third was enthusiastic about fostering well-being in youngsters and young men and women who've grown up in adverse situations, placing greater effort on advertising resilience via prevention or intervention, and developing educational and healthcar.
+
Board. Lenoir County was selected because the setting for the Heart Healthful Lenoir project as it is situated within the heart from the "stroke belt" that runs by way of the southeastern United states of america. Furthermore, preceding assessment and neighborhood partnership improvement by way of the UNC Community Campus Partnership18 identified Lenoir County as certainly one of the two counties inside affordable travel distance from UNC-CH that had both the interest and minimum infrastructure/ capacity to help a long term academic-community partnership. In 2006, the per capita income with the County (population of roughly 60,000) was  20,965 in comparison with  32,234 for the rest of NC.19 Roughly 74  of Lenoir County residents are overweight or obese, in comparison with 63  of all N.C. residents that are overweight or obese.19 The county seat can be a smaller town (estimated population 22,056), along with the two subsequent biggest towns have estimated populations of 2737 and 527, respectively. The very first phase with the Heart Healthy Lenoir Project was a year-long assessment and preparation phase. In keeping with CBPR and guided by the SEM, we used both qualitativeFam Neighborhood Overall health. Author manuscript; accessible in PMC 2014 September 05.Jilcott Pitts et al.Pageand quantitative methods to assess individual, interpersonal, organizational, neighborhood, and policy variables and priorities relevant to CVD risk reduction. The SEM grounded our work, with unique levels of the model addressed by numerous strategies, as described in Table 1. We conducted qualitative interviews with neighborhood members and agency leaders; performed audits of community, food venues, and park venues; examined secondary information sources; and obtained feedback from local leaders. We utilised this multi-method method to (1) increase both our breadth and depth of understanding of community-level assets, barriers, beliefs, and priorities; (two) create a technique to hyperlink participants to healthy consuming and PA assets by way of creation of a Neighborhood Resource Guide; (three) discover of barriers to address by means of environmental and policy alterations; and (4) identify individual-level interactions with neighborhood assets and barriers, and how these might be addressed in the life style intervention developed as a element on the Heart-Healthy Lenoir Project. We used a CBPR approach to engage community partners. Lenoir County leaders were involved using the initial conceptualization of the project and assisted with development with the grant proposal. When the grant was awarded, we formed a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) that incorporated local neighborhood residents and agency leaders, and have held quarterly meetings to solicit feedback and report on the project. We examined social and physical assets and barriers to healthier eating and physical activity in Lenoir County using in-depth interviews among community members (interviewers were also educated neighborhood members) and conducted in-depth interviews with community agency leaders. We drafted a Community Resource Guide and obtained input around the Guide from neighborhood and CAC members. Neighborhood members accompanied the study team members on community audits to provide insider data on context. Ultimately, CAC members supplied feedback regarding `win-ability' of various nutrition and PA policies. Community Members' Perspectives of Community Level Assets and Barriers To assess individuals' interactions with community-level assets and barriers related to healthful life style alterations, we conducted face-to-face interviews with community m.

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 14:08, 11 ตุลาคม 2564

Lenoir County was chosen because the setting for the Heart Board. Lenoir County was selected because the setting for the Heart Healthful Lenoir project as it is situated within the heart from the "stroke belt" that runs by way of the southeastern United states of america. Furthermore, preceding assessment and neighborhood partnership improvement by way of the UNC Community Campus Partnership18 identified Lenoir County as certainly one of the two counties inside affordable travel distance from UNC-CH that had both the interest and minimum infrastructure/ capacity to help a long term academic-community partnership. In 2006, the per capita income with the County (population of roughly 60,000) was 20,965 in comparison with 32,234 for the rest of NC.19 Roughly 74 of Lenoir County residents are overweight or obese, in comparison with 63 of all N.C. residents that are overweight or obese.19 The county seat can be a smaller town (estimated population 22,056), along with the two subsequent biggest towns have estimated populations of 2737 and 527, respectively. The very first phase with the Heart Healthy Lenoir Project was a year-long assessment and preparation phase. In keeping with CBPR and guided by the SEM, we used both qualitativeFam Neighborhood Overall health. Author manuscript; accessible in PMC 2014 September 05.Jilcott Pitts et al.Pageand quantitative methods to assess individual, interpersonal, organizational, neighborhood, and policy variables and priorities relevant to CVD risk reduction. The SEM grounded our work, with unique levels of the model addressed by numerous strategies, as described in Table 1. We conducted qualitative interviews with neighborhood members and agency leaders; performed audits of community, food venues, and park venues; examined secondary information sources; and obtained feedback from local leaders. We utilised this multi-method method to (1) increase both our breadth and depth of understanding of community-level assets, barriers, beliefs, and priorities; (two) create a technique to hyperlink participants to healthy consuming and PA assets by way of creation of a Neighborhood Resource Guide; (three) discover of barriers to address by means of environmental and policy alterations; and (4) identify individual-level interactions with neighborhood assets and barriers, and how these might be addressed in the life style intervention developed as a element on the Heart-Healthy Lenoir Project. We used a CBPR approach to engage community partners. Lenoir County leaders were involved using the initial conceptualization of the project and assisted with development with the grant proposal. When the grant was awarded, we formed a Community Advisory Committee (CAC) that incorporated local neighborhood residents and agency leaders, and have held quarterly meetings to solicit feedback and report on the project. We examined social and physical assets and barriers to healthier eating and physical activity in Lenoir County using in-depth interviews among community members (interviewers were also educated neighborhood members) and conducted in-depth interviews with community agency leaders. We drafted a Community Resource Guide and obtained input around the Guide from neighborhood and CAC members. Neighborhood members accompanied the study team members on community audits to provide insider data on context. Ultimately, CAC members supplied feedback regarding `win-ability' of various nutrition and PA policies. Community Members' Perspectives of Community Level Assets and Barriers To assess individuals' interactions with community-level assets and barriers related to healthful life style alterations, we conducted face-to-face interviews with community m.