ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
Lockrod75 (คุย | มีส่วนร่วม) ล |
Broker70bra (คุย | มีส่วนร่วม) ล |
||
แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
− | + | Sufferers deemed to become veryhigh-risk are then reviewed collectively by the surgeon, anesthesia, and hospitalist team members. Specifically for CVA, individuals with risk elements identified within this report are assessed for carotid atherosclerotic disease. Furthermore, those with cardiacAlpesh A. Patel MDarrhythmias or atrial fibrillation are assessed for preexisting cardiac thrombi by echocardiography. Sufferers with correctable danger things might have surgery delayed although others could move ahead, albeit with a clearer understanding of surgical risks. Dr. Leopold: The language physicians use to describe danger to patients can substantially influence patients' decisions. For instance, telling a patient with diabetes that his danger for stroke soon after elective spine surgery is far significantly less than 1 , and telling him that his danger may very well be 3 or 4 instances much more serious than the standard patient undergoing the surgery each may very well be correct based in your information. However the former appears reassuring, plus the latter soundsVolume 474, Number three, MarchEditor's Spotlight/Take 5Editor's Spotlight/Takeintimidating. How do you deal with this if you go over danger along with your patients Dr. Patel: It's all about viewpoint. Rather than biasing my patients towards 1 interpretation or the other, I present each sides. I want them to know what their absolute threat is, but additionally to understand how other aspects of their health can effect their relative danger of surgical complications. This brings their understanding of dangers to a level at which correct informed consent might be obtained, as well as improves the patient-physician connection. I consider additionally, it prepares a patient and their family for what could happen immediately after surgery. Complications that happen to be anticipated have a unique effect on individuals and families than complications that had been unexpected or not disclosed ahead of time. Dr. Leopold: One particular danger element believed to become vital for CVA soon after orthopaedic surgery--cardiac arrhythmia [9]--was not available for evaluation within your NSQIP dataset. How important a gap is this, and how could possibly it be incorporated into any predictive models or tools that might be created going forward Dr. Patel: That is basically a important limitation of our study. All studies of massive administrative or good quality databases are only as good as the facts contained inside thosedatasets. I believe that if cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation could have been incorporated, they would have already been identified as a threat for CVA. In my practice, the presence of those ailments is deemed a danger for perioperative CVA and is managed as such using a presurgical cardiac evaluation. However, generating a danger calculator for CVA is difficult, predominantly due to the smaller quantity of events that occur even inside a big database like NSQIP. Though danger factors is often identified statistically across a sizable variety of procedures, our knowledge loses granularity since it gets down for the degree of the person patient or procedure. Dr. Leopold: Apart from stroke, what other postoperative complications have received inadequate interest and what might be carried out to remedy that Dr. Patel: There are actually several complications which have not been appropriately addressed. Some, such as dysphagia and dysphonia immediately after anterior cervical procedures, when frequently reported, have already been poorly defined and evaluated with nonvalidated scoring systems. | |
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− |
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 05:58, 14 ธันวาคม 2564
Sufferers deemed to become veryhigh-risk are then reviewed collectively by the surgeon, anesthesia, and hospitalist team members. Specifically for CVA, individuals with risk elements identified within this report are assessed for carotid atherosclerotic disease. Furthermore, those with cardiacAlpesh A. Patel MDarrhythmias or atrial fibrillation are assessed for preexisting cardiac thrombi by echocardiography. Sufferers with correctable danger things might have surgery delayed although others could move ahead, albeit with a clearer understanding of surgical risks. Dr. Leopold: The language physicians use to describe danger to patients can substantially influence patients' decisions. For instance, telling a patient with diabetes that his danger for stroke soon after elective spine surgery is far significantly less than 1 , and telling him that his danger may very well be 3 or 4 instances much more serious than the standard patient undergoing the surgery each may very well be correct based in your information. However the former appears reassuring, plus the latter soundsVolume 474, Number three, MarchEditor's Spotlight/Take 5Editor's Spotlight/Takeintimidating. How do you deal with this if you go over danger along with your patients Dr. Patel: It's all about viewpoint. Rather than biasing my patients towards 1 interpretation or the other, I present each sides. I want them to know what their absolute threat is, but additionally to understand how other aspects of their health can effect their relative danger of surgical complications. This brings their understanding of dangers to a level at which correct informed consent might be obtained, as well as improves the patient-physician connection. I consider additionally, it prepares a patient and their family for what could happen immediately after surgery. Complications that happen to be anticipated have a unique effect on individuals and families than complications that had been unexpected or not disclosed ahead of time. Dr. Leopold: One particular danger element believed to become vital for CVA soon after orthopaedic surgery--cardiac arrhythmia [9]--was not available for evaluation within your NSQIP dataset. How important a gap is this, and how could possibly it be incorporated into any predictive models or tools that might be created going forward Dr. Patel: That is basically a important limitation of our study. All studies of massive administrative or good quality databases are only as good as the facts contained inside thosedatasets. I believe that if cardiac arrhythmias such as atrial fibrillation could have been incorporated, they would have already been identified as a threat for CVA. In my practice, the presence of those ailments is deemed a danger for perioperative CVA and is managed as such using a presurgical cardiac evaluation. However, generating a danger calculator for CVA is difficult, predominantly due to the smaller quantity of events that occur even inside a big database like NSQIP. Though danger factors is often identified statistically across a sizable variety of procedures, our knowledge loses granularity since it gets down for the degree of the person patient or procedure. Dr. Leopold: Apart from stroke, what other postoperative complications have received inadequate interest and what might be carried out to remedy that Dr. Patel: There are actually several complications which have not been appropriately addressed. Some, such as dysphagia and dysphonia immediately after anterior cervical procedures, when frequently reported, have already been poorly defined and evaluated with nonvalidated scoring systems.