ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
ล
ล
แถว 1: แถว 1:
−
In Psychology | Perception ScienceDecember 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 1453 |Ungan and YagciogluWeber fraction for
+
Incomplete interpretation with the sentence can develop such missteps in processing with regards to a specific noun argument or its relation to other noun arguments, along with the interdependence of grammatical operations can then cause more errors in the sentence.Frontiers in Psychology | Language SciencesAugust 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 859 |Supalla et al.Cognitive scaffolding in functioning memoryGENERALIZATION two: INTERDEPENDENCE OF MORPHO-SYNTACTIC ERRORSOther reproductions of things containing DETs show that the position in the DET/specifier could shift, the DET may very well be omitted, or the DET may very well be copied towards the starting or end from the determiner phrase or of the whole clause. This could be noticed within the reproductions of Sentence #20, exactly where the determiner 1 appears beside the adjective Small plus the noun GIRL: 1 Small GIRL. Two topic responses are: Target: A single Small GIRL vs. Response: GIRL Small One particular or GIRL Small. In the first response, the word order deviation is often viewed as a pragmatic variant, given that bracketing of a phrase by a repeated determiner is usually a widespread ASL device for focus or emphasis; and prenominal adjectives are additional regularly displaced soon after the noun as an alternative to to any other position within the sentence. Alternatively, maybe the topic initially omitted DET and ADJ by mistake and after that filled inside the omitted material afterwards. But in either case, the displacement is constrained, with the DET omitted or displaced to a position immediately after the clause. Omission of DET occurs most typically amongst the subjects we tested and hence seems to be a prevalent response to serial memory limitations through the reproduction task. In contrast, omission or misplacement of your head noun GIRL is rare, presumably because of its syntactic salience and to the reality that the adjacent words A single and Tiny depend on its appearance. Overall there's a hierarchical partnership amongst these three words, with their part in the phrase determining the likelihood of their look and position in responses. These data help a constraint-based theory of reproduction functionality. Other classes of words (modals, qualifiers or quantifiers) comply with a related pattern.GENERALIZATION three: PROCESSING CHOKEPOINTSIn our evaluation of sentence responses, we also identified certain intra-sentential places where errors have been most likely to take place across all groups. We get in touch with these areas chokepoints: sentence areas where processing bottlenecks take place, as indicated by a high frequency of reproduction errors at that point in the sentence. Having said that, the variety and extent of errors in and beyond this point in the sentence have been probably to be fairly varied. The kind of error resulting from a certain chokepoint is dependent upon two aspects:(1) the basic fluency in the signer, and (two) lexico-morphosyntactic complexity of a certain word inside a sentence. The latter issue can induce a series of bottlenecks to get a distinct sentence item. Beyond this slot in the sentence, more error forms and quantity tend to cluster for signers, suggesting a non-linear hierarchy of grammatical domains constraining reproduction in these challenging circumstances. The effects on a certain word can come from its visual, semantic or syntactic resemblances with distinct words within the lexicon or from its long-distance grammatical relations with other words within the sentence. These chokepoints will not be restricted to a single grammatical domain. Earlier we illustrated the errors occurring within the g.
−
In Psychology | Perception ScienceDecember 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 1453 |Ungan and YagciogluWeber fraction for modifications in click ratethose measured by us for comparable rates. A dramatic alteration in WF for example the one particular observed in the 20?0 clicks/s variety in both of those earlier studies at the same time as within the present a single, is fairly uncommon within a single perception mechanism and clearly speaks for the presence of separate mechanisms for processing the click price at lengthy and short ICIs. This viewpoint is in line using the psychophysical observation produced by our subjects that the perceived qualities are distinct within the two ranges; i.e, speedy tapping rhythm versus pitch of a steady smooth sound, respectively.Distinct mechanisms for temporal and spectral discriminationThere are neural imaging studies indicating separate cortical mechanisms for temporal and spectral processing auditory stimuli. For instance the outcomes of the positron emission tomography study of Zatorre and Belin (2001), who examined the response of human auditory cortex to spectral and temporal variation, indicated specialization of the left-hemisphere auditory cortex for rapid temporal processing, as well as a complementary hemispheric specialization in right-hemisphere belt cortical locations for spectral processing. It's illustrated in Figure three that the above-explained behavior of the WF versus click price function might be modeled as a combination of two curves, 1 for low along with the other for highclick rates. We hypothesize that these two curves belong to two separate perception mechanisms for time intervals and pitch, respectively. There seems to become a area around 20 Hz in which the rate discrimination threshold is elevated to a maximum. Such a maximum has also been reported inside the current function of Phillips et al. (2012) who studied human sensitivity to price alteration in 25-click trains with ICIs involving 20 and 100 ms working with wideband clicks. They describe maximal WFs for ICIs around 40?0 ms, which specifically coincides with the ICI for which the WF displays a maximum inside the present study (i.e., 50 ms). It's to be noted that this region, in which each in the presumed time and pitch mechanisms are reasonably insensitive to rate alterations, coincides with all the array of repetition prices in which an initially high-frequency click train perceived as a continuous steady sound begins to be described by the subjects as a fluttered sound because the click price is decreased. Depending on these psychophysical observations, we speculate that, inside the low repetition rate region a temporal perception mechanism, which analyses time intervals involving peaks inside the neural activity pattern, is active; whereas within the greater repetition price region a pitch perception mechanism, which analyses the spectral options on the sound coded tonotopically within the peripheral and central mechanisms in the auditory method, requires over. Nonetheless, as schematized in Figure three,FIGURE three | An illustration showing that the variation of WF as a function of click rate might be modeled as a combination of two curves, 1 for low and also the other for higher click rates. We hypothesize that these two curves, that are drawn by blue and red lines, belong to two separate perception mechanisms for time intervals and pitch, functioning at lengthy andshort inter-onset intervals, respectively.
 

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 08:26, 24 มิถุนายน 2564

Incomplete interpretation with the sentence can develop such missteps in processing with regards to a specific noun argument or its relation to other noun arguments, along with the interdependence of grammatical operations can then cause more errors in the sentence.Frontiers in Psychology | Language SciencesAugust 2014 | Volume 5 | Report 859 |Supalla et al.Cognitive scaffolding in functioning memoryGENERALIZATION two: INTERDEPENDENCE OF MORPHO-SYNTACTIC ERRORSOther reproductions of things containing DETs show that the position in the DET/specifier could shift, the DET may very well be omitted, or the DET may very well be copied towards the starting or end from the determiner phrase or of the whole clause. This could be noticed within the reproductions of Sentence #20, exactly where the determiner 1 appears beside the adjective Small plus the noun GIRL: 1 Small GIRL. Two topic responses are: Target: A single Small GIRL vs. Response: GIRL Small One particular or GIRL Small. In the first response, the word order deviation is often viewed as a pragmatic variant, given that bracketing of a phrase by a repeated determiner is usually a widespread ASL device for focus or emphasis; and prenominal adjectives are additional regularly displaced soon after the noun as an alternative to to any other position within the sentence. Alternatively, maybe the topic initially omitted DET and ADJ by mistake and after that filled inside the omitted material afterwards. But in either case, the displacement is constrained, with the DET omitted or displaced to a position immediately after the clause. Omission of DET occurs most typically amongst the subjects we tested and hence seems to be a prevalent response to serial memory limitations through the reproduction task. In contrast, omission or misplacement of your head noun GIRL is rare, presumably because of its syntactic salience and to the reality that the adjacent words A single and Tiny depend on its appearance. Overall there's a hierarchical partnership amongst these three words, with their part in the phrase determining the likelihood of their look and position in responses. These data help a constraint-based theory of reproduction functionality. Other classes of words (modals, qualifiers or quantifiers) comply with a related pattern.GENERALIZATION three: PROCESSING CHOKEPOINTSIn our evaluation of sentence responses, we also identified certain intra-sentential places where errors have been most likely to take place across all groups. We get in touch with these areas chokepoints: sentence areas where processing bottlenecks take place, as indicated by a high frequency of reproduction errors at that point in the sentence. Having said that, the variety and extent of errors in and beyond this point in the sentence have been probably to be fairly varied. The kind of error resulting from a certain chokepoint is dependent upon two aspects:(1) the basic fluency in the signer, and (two) lexico-morphosyntactic complexity of a certain word inside a sentence. The latter issue can induce a series of bottlenecks to get a distinct sentence item. Beyond this slot in the sentence, more error forms and quantity tend to cluster for signers, suggesting a non-linear hierarchy of grammatical domains constraining reproduction in these challenging circumstances. The effects on a certain word can come from its visual, semantic or syntactic resemblances with distinct words within the lexicon or from its long-distance grammatical relations with other words within the sentence. These chokepoints will not be restricted to a single grammatical domain. Earlier we illustrated the errors occurring within the g.

ดึงข้อมูลจาก "https://wiki.surinsanghasociety.com/index.php?title=หน้าหลัก&oldid=118169"