ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"
Lawsaw99 (คุย | มีส่วนร่วม) ล |
Keyradio76 (คุย | มีส่วนร่วม) ล |
||
| แถว 1: | แถว 1: | ||
| − | + | Le investment and work that goes into educating young people today in | |
| + | Le investment and work that goes into educating young folks in IVQPs should be supported by research into promoting the development of competencies. In precisely such contexts, self-regulation and resilience have been identified as important elements which can figure out accomplishment or failure (Artuch, 2014). It can be important for social inclusion to be envisioned inside the wider context of mental health, well-being and recovery (Repper and Perkins, 2003). In Dweck (2009): "The twenty-first century will belong towards the passionate and resilient learners" (p. 9), and this most likely applies to atrisk students much more than it does to these in mainstream contexts.Kumpfer, and other people (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012), many authors have pursued the idea of promoting resilience in kids and young people who're otherwise seen as "vulnerable" (Pearce, 2011). Empirical study establishes 3 vital situations in the conceptualization of resilience: (a) expanding up in, or locating oneself in an adverse circumstance (generally subjective); (b) the availability of protective factors (internal and external), and (c) managing to adapt positively despite the knowledge of adversity (Gonz ez-Torres and Artuch, 2014). This optimistic adaptation, as Fergus and Zimmerman (2005) indicate, is really a resilient outcome, a approach to overcome a threat. Henderson and Milstein (2003, p. 26) generating clear reference for the educational sphere, define it as "...the capacity to spring back, rebound, successfully adapt in the face of adversity and develop social, academic and vocational competence despite exposure to severe stress or simply to the pressure that is inherent in today's world."Development in the ConstructThe construct resilience has been developed scientifically in four waves or generations of research (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012; O'Dougherty et al., 2013; Prince-Embury and Saklosfke, 2013) and in two distinct geographical settings (France and the USA). Other European authors outdoors France (Rutter, 2005, 2006, 2007) and Latin American authors (Kotliarenco et al., 1997) have also studied the notion, but the bulk of the literature comes from these two nations. Based on Masten's work (2004) "Resilience in creating systems: Progress and guarantee as the 4th wave rises," we can point to the existence of four stages within the analysis about resilience. The initial was enthusiastic about identifying a quick list of protective/buffering variables (internal and external) when facing threat and trauma. Internal elements for example high intelligence, development of appropriate coping techniques, optimism, difficulty solving, self-regulation have already been observed to act to safeguard men and women against adverse conditions (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012; Garc -Vesga and Dom guez-de la Ossa, 2013). Alternatively, parenting styles, family members structure and cohesiveness and teacher and peer relations belong towards the external protectors. Notwithstanding, it have to be kept in thoughts that no single factor promotes resilience in isolation (Grotberg, 1995; Fergus and Zimmerman, 2005). The second wave sought to understand how protective and risk variables interact inside the method of creating up resilience, and different models of resilience were developed (Fergus and Zimmerman, 2005; Beco , 2006). The third was enthusiastic about fostering well-being in youngsters and young men and women who've grown up in adverse situations, placing greater effort on advertising resilience via prevention or intervention, and developing educational and healthcar. | ||
รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 14:05, 11 ตุลาคม 2564
Le investment and work that goes into educating young people today in Le investment and work that goes into educating young folks in IVQPs should be supported by research into promoting the development of competencies. In precisely such contexts, self-regulation and resilience have been identified as important elements which can figure out accomplishment or failure (Artuch, 2014). It can be important for social inclusion to be envisioned inside the wider context of mental health, well-being and recovery (Repper and Perkins, 2003). In Dweck (2009): "The twenty-first century will belong towards the passionate and resilient learners" (p. 9), and this most likely applies to atrisk students much more than it does to these in mainstream contexts.Kumpfer, and other people (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012), many authors have pursued the idea of promoting resilience in kids and young people who're otherwise seen as "vulnerable" (Pearce, 2011). Empirical study establishes 3 vital situations in the conceptualization of resilience: (a) expanding up in, or locating oneself in an adverse circumstance (generally subjective); (b) the availability of protective factors (internal and external), and (c) managing to adapt positively despite the knowledge of adversity (Gonz ez-Torres and Artuch, 2014). This optimistic adaptation, as Fergus and Zimmerman (2005) indicate, is really a resilient outcome, a approach to overcome a threat. Henderson and Milstein (2003, p. 26) generating clear reference for the educational sphere, define it as "...the capacity to spring back, rebound, successfully adapt in the face of adversity and develop social, academic and vocational competence despite exposure to severe stress or simply to the pressure that is inherent in today's world."Development in the ConstructThe construct resilience has been developed scientifically in four waves or generations of research (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012; O'Dougherty et al., 2013; Prince-Embury and Saklosfke, 2013) and in two distinct geographical settings (France and the USA). Other European authors outdoors France (Rutter, 2005, 2006, 2007) and Latin American authors (Kotliarenco et al., 1997) have also studied the notion, but the bulk of the literature comes from these two nations. Based on Masten's work (2004) "Resilience in creating systems: Progress and guarantee as the 4th wave rises," we can point to the existence of four stages within the analysis about resilience. The initial was enthusiastic about identifying a quick list of protective/buffering variables (internal and external) when facing threat and trauma. Internal elements for example high intelligence, development of appropriate coping techniques, optimism, difficulty solving, self-regulation have already been observed to act to safeguard men and women against adverse conditions (Zolkoski and Bullock, 2012; Garc -Vesga and Dom guez-de la Ossa, 2013). Alternatively, parenting styles, family members structure and cohesiveness and teacher and peer relations belong towards the external protectors. Notwithstanding, it have to be kept in thoughts that no single factor promotes resilience in isolation (Grotberg, 1995; Fergus and Zimmerman, 2005). The second wave sought to understand how protective and risk variables interact inside the method of creating up resilience, and different models of resilience were developed (Fergus and Zimmerman, 2005; Beco , 2006). The third was enthusiastic about fostering well-being in youngsters and young men and women who've grown up in adverse situations, placing greater effort on advertising resilience via prevention or intervention, and developing educational and healthcar.
