ผลต่างระหว่างรุ่นของ "หน้าหลัก"

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา
แถว 1: แถว 1:
1c, the probability for posting questions gi decays together with the variety of the user's actions Ni. Crucial for the cognitive procedure, nevertheless, is the broad selection of the user's experience. As discussed in Procedures, it's measured by the entropy distribution shown in Fig. 1e. When the majority knowledge involves involving one and four tags, handful of men and women have an activity record for any large number of subjects. Consequently, the look of a particular mixture of cognitive elements shows a complicated pattern. All distinct combinations of tags identified in the dataset obey Zipf 's law, see Fig. 2. It really is a marked feature of scale-invariance within the collective dynamics28,29. The ranking distribution of individual tags is also broad, Fig. 2 in SI. Additionally, by directly inspecting the related time series, Figs 4 and 5, we discover that an actively self-organized social procedure underlies the observed dynamics of cognitive components.Scientific RepoRts | 5:12197 | DOi: ten.1038/srepResultswww.nature.com/scientificreports/Figure 1. Tags-matching illustration along with the activity patterns of users and tags in Mathematics. (a) Schematically shown a sequence of events with matching of tags (colored boxes) in between actors' knowledge (displayed as a particular set of tags above blue circles--actors, Ui), the answers Aj, and concerns Qj containing the tags with the connected actor's expertise. The path of lines towards/outwards every actor indicates the process of reading/posting occasion. (b) Bipartite network of customers (blue) and answers (red) at a favored query (big red node). (c) Probability gi of posting a new question by the user i plotted against its total activity Ni, averaged over all customers in the dataset. (d) The distributions on the interactivity time  T for users and tags. (e) The distribution with the user's knowledge entropy Si averaged over all customers in the information. (f) Every single point indicates the entropy related using the probability on the appearance of a certain tag along a sequence of m time intervals, exactly where m may be the tag's frequency. Reduce set of points represents the entropies for all tags computed in the sequence of events inside the empirical information though the upper set is obtained from its randomized version.Figure 2. Innovation growth by the actor's expertise. Major panel: The amount of new combinations of tags CT(N) at inquiries like answers to them is plotted against rising total number of artifacts N. The curves 0 ???4 are for the empirical information and simulations where the number of the agent's experience is fixed as follows: (ExpS), 2S-tags knowledge exactly where S is taken in the distribution in Fig. 1e, and (Expn), ntags knowledge where n = 4, 3, 2. Inset (a) Enhance with the knowledge at a specific query EQ(t) over time t for diverse distributions of knowledge as within the central panel. Inset (b) Ranking distribution for frequency of new combinations of tags appearing in inquiries and also the associated answers for (0) the empirical information and (1) simulation in the case ExpS.Scientific RepoRts | 5:12197 | DOi: ten.1038/srepwww.nature.com/scientificreports/Figure 3. Measuring the effect of a particular cognitive content material (-tag). Likelihood O(K) for four most active tags (a) and Data divergen.
+
Therefore, if a participant talked about a objective of `cleaning their room' on contact five, on get in touch with 6 they have been asked if they completed this precise target. For a subset of participants (individuals with schizophrenia N=25, without having N=21) we assessed how complicated the participant believed each objective would be, working with the same 0? Likert scale. There had been no demographic variations between these participants nor between the all round subject samples. Property Assessment--After the EMA week, two independent analysis assistants travelled towards the properties of 40 participants with schizophrenia and 32 participants without having schizophrenia to complete the residence assessment. Seven people today with schizophrenia and nine individuals with out schizophrenia decided to not full the property assessment. The causes for not finishing the assessment included scheduling problems (unavailable inside the numerous weeks soon after the EMA period), not feeling comfy using the assessment, plus a roommate or parent not feeling comfy with the residence assessment. There have been no demographic differences between participants who completed the household assessment and those who did not, nor had been there differences inside group, on measured dependent variables. As soon as within the dwelling in the participant, analysis assistants completed a modified version on the Environmental Assessment Scale (Quick; Velligan  Bow-Thomas, 2000; Velligan et al., 2000). This scale measures various aspects for the home environment and has been made use of primarily in Cognitive Adaptive Coaching in schizophrenia. So as to derive a stimulating/rewarding environment score we added things to the Effortless from the Home Observation for the Measurement of the Atmosphere (Home; Elardo  Bradley, 1981). The two raters coded how stimulating/ rewarding the environment was on three factors 1) how aesthetically stimulating/rewarding the household was (e.g., photographs around the walls, irrespective of whether the environment was not cluttered, dark or monotonous), availability of media (e.g., books, magazines, cable Tv, net, telephone access), and social stimulation (e.g., presence of other individuals in their living atmosphere and how typically participants reported interacting with these people today). We computed an typical rating of all 3 domains (for an `overall stimulation' score) and person averages from the 3 separate subdomains. Inter-rater reliability on the home assessment was computed working with intra-class correlations (ICC), which indicates the degree of agreement/disagreement involving coders and can variety from -1.0 to 1.0. All ICCs for this study have been calculated using a two-way mixed, consistency, average-measures ICC as described and suggested by McGraw  Wong (1996). ICC's for the household assessment were all > .80, indicating outstanding agreement. Neurocognition--During a separate laboratory session, 40 participants with schizophrenia completed the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (Nuechterlein et al., 2008). There had been no differences between the 7 individuals who didn't return for the MATRICS testing andNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Abnorm Psychol. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 2015 November 01.Gard et al.Pagethe 40 that did. We made use of an general typical of these measures for all analyses reported right here. Analyses have been also completed applying the subdomains from the MATRICS, with practically identical findings for working memory and processing speed. We report on the overall average here for brevity. Clinician ratings of functioning--Participants with schi.

รุ่นแก้ไขเมื่อ 03:20, 28 ตุลาคม 2564

Therefore, if a participant talked about a objective of `cleaning their room' on contact five, on get in touch with 6 they have been asked if they completed this precise target. For a subset of participants (individuals with schizophrenia N=25, without having N=21) we assessed how complicated the participant believed each objective would be, working with the same 0? Likert scale. There had been no demographic variations between these participants nor between the all round subject samples. Property Assessment--After the EMA week, two independent analysis assistants travelled towards the properties of 40 participants with schizophrenia and 32 participants without having schizophrenia to complete the residence assessment. Seven people today with schizophrenia and nine individuals with out schizophrenia decided to not full the property assessment. The causes for not finishing the assessment included scheduling problems (unavailable inside the numerous weeks soon after the EMA period), not feeling comfy using the assessment, plus a roommate or parent not feeling comfy with the residence assessment. There have been no demographic differences between participants who completed the household assessment and those who did not, nor had been there differences inside group, on measured dependent variables. As soon as within the dwelling in the participant, analysis assistants completed a modified version on the Environmental Assessment Scale (Quick; Velligan Bow-Thomas, 2000; Velligan et al., 2000). This scale measures various aspects for the home environment and has been made use of primarily in Cognitive Adaptive Coaching in schizophrenia. So as to derive a stimulating/rewarding environment score we added things to the Effortless from the Home Observation for the Measurement of the Atmosphere (Home; Elardo Bradley, 1981). The two raters coded how stimulating/ rewarding the environment was on three factors 1) how aesthetically stimulating/rewarding the household was (e.g., photographs around the walls, irrespective of whether the environment was not cluttered, dark or monotonous), availability of media (e.g., books, magazines, cable Tv, net, telephone access), and social stimulation (e.g., presence of other individuals in their living atmosphere and how typically participants reported interacting with these people today). We computed an typical rating of all 3 domains (for an `overall stimulation' score) and person averages from the 3 separate subdomains. Inter-rater reliability on the home assessment was computed working with intra-class correlations (ICC), which indicates the degree of agreement/disagreement involving coders and can variety from -1.0 to 1.0. All ICCs for this study have been calculated using a two-way mixed, consistency, average-measures ICC as described and suggested by McGraw Wong (1996). ICC's for the household assessment were all > .80, indicating outstanding agreement. Neurocognition--During a separate laboratory session, 40 participants with schizophrenia completed the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (Nuechterlein et al., 2008). There had been no differences between the 7 individuals who didn't return for the MATRICS testing andNIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author ManuscriptJ Abnorm Psychol. Author manuscript; obtainable in PMC 2015 November 01.Gard et al.Pagethe 40 that did. We made use of an general typical of these measures for all analyses reported right here. Analyses have been also completed applying the subdomains from the MATRICS, with practically identical findings for working memory and processing speed. We report on the overall average here for brevity. Clinician ratings of functioning--Participants with schi.