หน้าหลัก

จาก wiki.surinsanghasociety
ไปยังการนำทาง ไปยังการค้นหา

He Illumina 170k CanineHD array, which was developed working with the dog reference sequences (generated from a Boxer plus a Poodle) and pooled DNA from a series of European and Asian breeds (Irish Wolfhounds, West Highland White Terriers, Belgian Shepherds, and Shar-Peis) also as pooled wolf DNA as described in (Vaysse et al. 2011). We customized this array by adding 12,143 markers ascertained from entire genome sequencing information from mainly Eurasian village dogs (Auton et al. 2013), roughly equally split in between East Asian and Western dogs. Markers have been preferentially selected for getting in coding regions but poorly tagged by existing array markers. The genotypes had been combined with published CanineHD data from (Axelsson et al. 2013). The full SNP panels (3 million SNPs for the CanineHD array design and 14 million SNPs for the custom array content material) was pruned for evenness, capacity to style probe sequence, and efficiency. Generally, no work was produced to differentially enrich one source or a further in particular regions of the genome, except that a subset of custom SNPs wereMol Ecol. Author manuscript; accessible in PMC 2017 January 01.Schlamp et al.Pagespecifically included within the IGF1 and MSRB3 regions to facilitate fine-mapping of these loci. No such enrichment of markers was made for the other 10 loci. The un-imputed dataset contained a contact rate more than 99.1 , and no locus contained >5 missing data. Imputation was completed for the reason that some techniques to detect positive choice demand no missing information, however the proportion of imputed genotypes is negligible and unlikely to bias the outcomes. Phasing was performed for all autosomal and X chromosome markers with minor allele https://britishrestaurantawards.org/members/tellersled1/activity/427304/ Frequency (MAF) > 0.01 employing SHAPEIT (Delaneau et al. 2013). Choose regions displaying strong evidence of good choice when comparing allele frequency information across breeds and linked having a known phenotypic effect were selected for analyzing choice signatures in each and every population. Frequency estimates of causal mutations in breeds Selection signatures had been estimated from a randomly chosen subset of 25 unrelated men and women per breed. The allele frequency of the causal variant (when recognized) or the top rated connected variant was estimated from the complete dataset (Hayward et al. in evaluation) based on a substantially larger variety of people genotyped (25 to 722 dogs per breed). Choice scans The hapFLK statistic was calculated using the plan hapflk (version 1.two) (Fariello et al. 2013), downloaded from: https://forge-dga.jouy.inra.fr/projects/hapflk (August 2015). The population tree was obtained by hapFLK to compute Reynolds distances along with the kinship matrix across all 25 breeds genome-wide, using Culpeo Fox because the outgroup. The hapFLK scan was run making use of all 25 breeds genome-wide. We applied the following parameters: 8 clusters (-K 8), 20 EM runs to fit the LD model (-nfit=20), phased data (--phased). When hapFLK values have been generated, we calculated P-values by fitting a regular normal distribution genome-wide in R (Fariello et al. 2013). iHS scans were performed working with the plan selscan (version 1.0.4) (Szpiech Hernandez 2014), downloaded from: http://github.com/szpiech/selscan (April 2015). All scans were run on polarized information with default iHS selscan parameters: --max-extend 1000000 (maximum EHH extension in bp), --max-gap 200000 (maximum gap allowed in between two SNPs in bp), --cutoff 0.05 (EHH decay cutoff). We employed the recombination map of Auton et al. (Auton et al. 2013).