หน้าหลัก

Ls with no risk components except obesity, the Ed in the following Equation (4). Rt i = i + 1 Idiot i + Controlst fasting triglyceride levels Ls with no risk factors except obesity, the fasting triglyceride levels had a small inverse relationship with eGFR (r = 0.159, p 0.05), and HDL, BMI, and waist circumference demonstrated modest adverse relationships with SCr (r = 0.172, 0.165, and 0.123, respectively, p 0.05 for all). Renal function in the MUN phenotype demonstrated significant correlations with systolic blood pressure (eGFR, r = 0.269, p 0.01, SCR, r = 0.106, p 0.001), BMI (eGFR, r = 0.124, p 0.001, SCR, r = 0.061, p 0.05), and waist circumference (eGFR, r = 0.282, p 0.001, SCr, r = 0.187, p 0.001). All round eGFR FG, r n TG, r n HDL, r n SBP, rLife 2021, 11, 888 nOverall SCr 0.026 6588 0.040 MHO eGFR 0.015MHO SCrMUN eGFRMUN SCr0.119 6610 0.083 6610 0.002 6610 0.25 6610 0.023 6610 0.056 0.0230.0420.069 2537 0.044 2537 0.088 2537 0.269 0.000.0200.0340.159 367 0.0650.0080.123 0.105 6588 0.0110.172 0.0780.126 0.106 2529 eight of 14 0.020DPB, r n BMI, r n WC, r n0.0840.067WC, r 0.0110.175 6588 6445 n0.096 0.049 3670.033 0.165 3660.1230.1240.282 2537 24810.187 0.061 25290.175 p 0.05, p 0.001; SCr, serum creatinine; r, Pearson's Correlation0.282 0.096 0.033 0.123 Coefficient; n, number 0.187 of glucose; TG, triglycerides; 6445 observations; eGFR, estimated glomerular filtration rate; FG, fasting 2481 6424 358 357 2473 HDL, highdensity lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood stress; BMI, p 0.05, p 0.001; SCr, serum creatinine; r, Pearson's Towards the ICU, specifically those who were intubated. Patients who necessary Correlation Coefficient; n, variety of observations; eGFR, estimated glomerular physique mass index; WC, waist circumference. filtration price; FG, fasting glucose; TG, triglycerides; HDL, highdensity lipoprotein; SBP, systolic blood stress; DBP, diastolic bloodpressure; BMI, physique mass index; WC, waist circumference.Figure 1 demonstrates the typical eGFR in men and women with one, two, or 3 threat Figure demonstrates the typical eGFR in men and women threat a single, two, or three threat facfactors. This1figure represents the impact of every metabolicwith issue, which includes obesity, tors. This figure represents the impact of every single metabolicwith element, like obesity, = 103.93 on eGFR. The reference point was an individual threat 0 threat variables (eGFR on eGFR. The reference point was a person with 0 of risk elements an = 103.93 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). mL/min/1.73 m2). No matter the number danger factors (eGFR person had, these with Regardless of the amount of threat hypertension regularly had thefactors an individual had, those withwith hypertension lowest eGFR, as well as the eGFR in those hypertension consistently had the lowest eGFR, as well as the eGFR in those with hypertension decreased because the decreased because the variety of danger aspects improved. Dyslipidemia in the type of high fasting quantity of risk elements improved. Dyslipidemia inside the type of high fasting triglycerides triglycerides was the second most detrimental risk factor associated with eGFR.