หน้าหลัก

Rt tool to assistance CPG analysis and to foster collaboration on Rt tool to assistance CPG analysis and to foster collaboration on cross- cutting CPG implementation concerns. Components and strategies DIRC leadership facilitated a meeting of implementation researchers and investigators interested in CPG research. The meeting revealed confusion about diverse study purposes, like CPG creation, effectiveness testing, modification, and implementation. Final results We developed a flowchart distinguishing amongst distinctive CPGrelated analysis aims. The tool assists investigators clarify whetherA40 Beyond symptom tracking: clinician perceptions of a hybrid measurement feedback method for monitoring therapy fidelity and client progress Jack H. Andrews, Benjamin D. Johnides, Estee M. Hausman, Kristin M. Hawley Division of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA Correspondence: Jack H. Andrews ([email protected]) ?Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, 65211, USA Implementation Science 2016, 11(Suppl 1):A40 Background A expanding physique of research suggests that measurement feedback systems (MFSs) possess the potential to generate widespread improvementsImplementation Science 2016, Volume 11 SupplPage 21 ofthey want to make new CPGs, study CPG effectiveness, modify CPGs, or implement CPGs. These studying guideline implementation are directed to resources, like exemplar reports of CPG implementation and conceptual frameworks and procedures for CPG research. The selection support tool has been refined through user feedback. Conclusions The CPG decision assistance tool is periodically updated by DIRC employees and is often a helpful resource for the ICTS and DIRC. Fostering collaboration and providing tools to investigators is essential in advancing and enhancing efficiency of implementation investigation.Acknowledgments This study was supported by NIMH Grant T32 MH019960 and NIH CTSA Grant UL1 TR000448.three. Park AL, Chorpita BF, Regan J, Weisz JR, Study Network on Youth Mental Overall health. Integrity of evidence-based practice: are providers modifying practice content or practice sequencing. Admn Policy Ment Well being. 2015 Mar 1;42(two):186?6. four. Palinkas LA, Weisz JR, Chorpita BF, Levine B, Garland AF, Hoagwood KE, Landsverk J. Continued use of evidence-based therapies just after a randomized controlled effectiveness trial: a qualitative study. Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Nov 1. five. Dorsey S, Berliner L, Lyon AR, Pullmann MD, Murray, LK. A statewide popular components initiative for children's mental wellness. J Behav Wellness Serv Res. 2014;1.A42 Dabblers, bedazzlers, or total makeovers: Clinician modification of a typical components cognitive behavioral therapy method Rosemary D. Meza1, Shannon Dorsey1, Shannon Wiltsey Stirman2, Georganna Sedlar3, Leah Lucid1 1 Division of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA; 2National Center for PTSD, VA Palo Alto Overall health Care Technique and Stanford University, Menlo Park, CA, 94024, USA; 3Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98102, USA Correspondence: Rosemary D. Meza ([email protected]) ?Division of Psychology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA Implementation Science 2016, 11(Suppl 1):A42 Background Clinician modification to evidence-based practices (EBP) has largely been discouraged; nevertheless, emerging views highlight the possibility for modification to enhance EBP fit and sustainability [1, 2]. Commonelements approaches that specifically involve fl.